From: Eric Ren <renzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, kan.liang@intel.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
renzhen@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: allocate pmu index for pci device dynamically
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 13:23:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180518052359.48756-1-renzhen@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
Some boxes/devices of uncore are exported as pcie devices. However,
the box number is different on different micro-architecture. For
example, the max memory channels for Broadwell is up to 8. However,
there are only 2 channels for Broadwell-DE, 4 channels for Broadwell-EP,
and 8 channels for Broadwell-EX.
The current code allocates pmu index statically so that on Broadwell-EP
machine "perf list|grep uncore" shows discontinuous iMC number, which
doesn't look nice:
Test on Broadwell-EP using "ls /sys/devices | grep -i imc":
Without this patch,
uncore_imc_0
uncore_imc_1
uncore_imc_4
uncore_imc_5
To maintain pmu index dynamically, move index allocation logic to
uncore_pci_probe(). As a result, we can get continuous index of iMC
devices under /sys/devices directory:
Applied this patch:,
uncore_imc_0
uncore_imc_1
uncore_imc_2
uncore_imc_3
Signed-off-by: Shanpei Chen <shanpeic@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <renzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 7 ++++++-
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index a7956fc..88d390e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -818,7 +818,9 @@ static int __init uncore_type_init(struct intel_uncore_type *type, bool setid)
for (i = 0; i < type->num_boxes; i++) {
pmus[i].func_id = setid ? i : -1;
- pmus[i].pmu_idx = i;
+ /* The pmu idx will be decided at probe for pci device. */
+ if (setid)
+ pmus[i].pmu_idx = i;
pmus[i].type = type;
pmus[i].boxes = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pmus[i].boxes)
@@ -957,6 +959,9 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
if (atomic_inc_return(&pmu->activeboxes) > 1)
return 0;
+ /* Count the real number of pmus for pci uncore device */
+ pmu->pmu_idx = type->num_pmus++;
+
/* First active box registers the pmu */
ret = uncore_pmu_register(pmu);
if (ret) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
index 414dc7e..c4f54fb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct intel_uncore_type {
const char *name;
int num_counters;
int num_boxes;
+ int num_pmus; /* for pci uncore device */
int perf_ctr_bits;
int fixed_ctr_bits;
unsigned perf_ctr;
--
1.8.3.1
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-18 5:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-18 5:23 Eric Ren [this message]
2018-05-18 14:52 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180518052359.48756-1-renzhen@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=renzhen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome