From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752230AbeERKLw (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 06:11:52 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:54460 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751560AbeERKLu (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 May 2018 06:11:50 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 12:11:14 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Nadav Amit , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, nadav.amit@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Josh Poimboeuf , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Denys Vlasenko Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: bug: prevent gcc distortions Message-ID: <20180518101114.GB17285@pd.tnic> References: <20180517161402.78089-1-namit@vmware.com> <20180517161402.78089-3-namit@vmware.com> <20180518075853.GD12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20180518081354.GA11379@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180518081354.GA11379@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:13:54AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Yes, that's my main worry too about all these inlining changes: > the very, very marked reduction in the readability of assembly code. Same reaction here: the small improvements this brings is simply not enough to sacrifice readability so much IMO. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.