From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S939330AbeE1Otr (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2018 10:49:47 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:48514 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932390AbeE1Otm (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 May 2018 10:49:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 16:49:24 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Paul Burton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Paul McKenney , Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Make select_task_rq() require cpu_active() for user tasks Message-ID: <20180528144924.GE12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180526154648.11635-1-paul.burton@mips.com> <20180526154648.11635-2-paul.burton@mips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180526154648.11635-2-paul.burton@mips.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 08:46:47AM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -1565,7 +1565,8 @@ int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int sd_flags, int wake_flags) > * not worry about this generic constraint ] > */ > if (unlikely(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) || > - !cpu_online(cpu))) > + !cpu_online(cpu) || > + (!cpu_active(cpu) && !(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)))) > cpu = select_fallback_rq(task_cpu(p), p); That is not quite right.. and I find that the wrong patch: 955dbdf4ce87 ("sched: Allow migrating kthreads into online but inactive CPUs") got merged over my suggested alternative :-( http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170725165821.cejhb7v2s3kecems@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net So, lets first fix that, and then your patch becomes something like the below I think. --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1562,7 +1562,7 @@ int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p * not worry about this generic constraint ] */ if (unlikely(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) || - !cpu_online(cpu))) + (is_per_cpu_kthread(p) ? !cpu_online(cpu) : !cpu_active(cpu))) cpu = select_fallback_rq(task_cpu(p), p); return cpu;