From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
Christopher Bostic <cbostic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: [PATCH 13/15] fsi/master-gpio: Replace bit_bit lock with IRQ disable/enable
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 11:30:42 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180529013044.23815-14-benh@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180529013044.23815-1-benh@kernel.crashing.org>
From: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
We currently use a spinlock (bit_lock) around operations that clock bits
out of the FSI bus, and a mutex to protect against simultaneous access
to the master.
This means that bit_lock isn't needed for mutual exlusion, only to
prevent timing issues when clocking bits out.
To reflect this, this change converts bit_lock to just the
local_irq_save/restore operation.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
---
drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c b/drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c
index da556da62846..084e9da8d151 100644
--- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.c
@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@
#include <linux/fsi.h>
#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/irqflags.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include "fsi-master.h"
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ struct fsi_master_gpio {
struct fsi_master master;
struct device *dev;
struct mutex cmd_lock; /* mutex for command ordering */
- spinlock_t bit_lock; /* lock for clocking bits out */
struct gpio_desc *gpio_clk;
struct gpio_desc *gpio_data;
struct gpio_desc *gpio_trans; /* Voltage translator */
@@ -367,7 +366,7 @@ static int read_one_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master,
uint8_t tag;
int i;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
/* wait for the start bit */
for (i = 0; i < FSI_GPIO_MTOE_COUNT; i++) {
@@ -380,7 +379,7 @@ static int read_one_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master,
if (i == FSI_GPIO_MTOE_COUNT) {
dev_dbg(master->dev,
"Master time out waiting for response\n");
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
@@ -399,7 +398,7 @@ static int read_one_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master,
/* read CRC */
serial_in(master, &msg, FSI_GPIO_CRC_SIZE);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
/* we have a whole message now; check CRC */
crc = crc4(0, 1, 1);
@@ -430,10 +429,10 @@ static int issue_term(struct fsi_master_gpio *master, uint8_t slave)
build_term_command(&cmd, slave);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
serial_out(master, &cmd);
echo_delay(master);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
rc = read_one_response(master, 0, NULL, &tag);
if (rc < 0) {
@@ -475,11 +474,11 @@ static int poll_for_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master,
"CRC error retry %d\n", crc_err_retries);
trace_fsi_master_gpio_crc_rsp_error(master);
build_epoll_command(&cmd, slave);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
clock_zeros(master, FSI_GPIO_EPOLL_CLOCKS);
serial_out(master, &cmd);
echo_delay(master);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
goto retry;
} else if (rc)
goto fail;
@@ -506,18 +505,18 @@ static int poll_for_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master,
*/
if (busy_count++ < FSI_GPIO_MAX_BUSY) {
build_dpoll_command(&cmd, slave);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
clock_zeros(master, FSI_GPIO_DPOLL_CLOCKS);
serial_out(master, &cmd);
echo_delay(master);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
goto retry;
}
dev_warn(master->dev,
"ERR slave is stuck in busy state, issuing TERM\n");
- spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
clock_zeros(master, FSI_GPIO_DPOLL_CLOCKS);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
issue_term(master, slave);
rc = -EIO;
break;
@@ -537,9 +536,10 @@ static int poll_for_response(struct fsi_master_gpio *master,
trace_fsi_master_gpio_poll_response_busy(master, busy_count);
fail:
/* Clock the slave enough to be ready for next operation */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
clock_zeros(master, FSI_GPIO_PRIME_SLAVE_CLOCKS);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
return rc;
}
@@ -548,15 +548,13 @@ static int send_request(struct fsi_master_gpio *master,
{
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bit_lock, flags);
- if (master->external_mode) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ if (master->external_mode)
return -EBUSY;
- }
+ local_irq_save(flags);
serial_out(master, cmd);
echo_delay(master);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -656,7 +654,7 @@ static int fsi_master_gpio_break(struct fsi_master *_master, int link)
return -EBUSY;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
set_sda_output(master, 1);
sda_out(master, 1);
@@ -667,7 +665,8 @@ static int fsi_master_gpio_break(struct fsi_master *_master, int link)
sda_out(master, 1);
clock_toggle(master, FSI_POST_BREAK_CLOCKS);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
+
last_address_update(master, 0, false, 0);
mutex_unlock(&master->cmd_lock);
@@ -688,9 +687,9 @@ static void fsi_master_gpio_init(struct fsi_master_gpio *master)
gpiod_direction_output(master->gpio_data, 1);
/* todo: evaluate if clocks can be reduced */
- spin_lock_irqsave(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
clock_zeros(master, FSI_INIT_CLOCKS);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&master->bit_lock, flags);
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
}
static void fsi_master_gpio_init_external(struct fsi_master_gpio *master)
@@ -832,7 +831,6 @@ static int fsi_master_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
master->master.send_break = fsi_master_gpio_break;
master->master.link_enable = fsi_master_gpio_link_enable;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, master);
- spin_lock_init(&master->bit_lock);
mutex_init(&master->cmd_lock);
fsi_master_gpio_init(master);
--
2.17.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-29 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-29 1:30 [PATCH 00/15] fsi: Overall improvements and new SBE fifo driver Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 01/15] fsi: gpio: Trace busy count Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 02/15] fsi: gpio: Remove unused 'id' variable Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 03/15] fsi: gpio: Use a mutex to protect transfers Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 04/15] fsi/fsi-master-gpio: Sample input data on different clock phase Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 05/15] fsi/fsi-master-gpio: Add "no-gpio-delays" option Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:43 ` [PATCH] dt-bindings: fsi-master-gpio: Document "no-gpio-delays" property Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-31 17:13 ` Rob Herring
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 06/15] fsi/fsi-master-gpio: Reduce turnaround clocks Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 07/15] fsi/fsi-master-gpio: Reduce dpoll clocks Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 08/15] fsi/fsi-master-gpio: Delay sampling of FSI data input Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 09/15] fsi/gpio: Include command build in locked section Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 10/15] fsi/gpio: Use relative-addressing commands Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 11/15] fsi/fsi-master-gpio: Implement CRC error recovery Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 12/15] fsi/fsi-master-gpio: More error handling cleanup Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 14/15] fsi: scom: Remove PIB reset during probe Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 1:30 ` [PATCH 15/15] fsi/sbefifo: Add driver for the SBE FIFO Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-05-29 12:30 ` [PATCH 00/15] fsi: Overall improvements and new SBE fifo driver Joel Stanley
2018-06-10 6:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-06-10 6:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180529013044.23815-14-benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cbostic@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=joel@jms.id.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome