From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751201AbeFDRE7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 13:04:59 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:40758 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751091AbeFDRE5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jun 2018 13:04:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:04:55 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/29] 4.9.106-stable review Message-ID: <20180604170455.GB27519@roeck-us.net> References: <20180604065802.157744637@linuxfoundation.org> <20180604161649.GA16269@roeck-us.net> <20180604165427.GA26908@roeck-us.net> <20180604165756.GA2004@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180604165756.GA2004@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Authenticated_sender: guenter@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: guenter@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 06:57:56PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:54:27AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 09:16:49AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 08:57:56AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.106 release. > > > > There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed Jun 6 06:57:52 UTC 2018. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > For v4.9.105-30-ge0f8632 (4.9.106-rc1-00030-ge0f8632): > > > > > > Build results: > > > total: 148 pass: 148 fail: 0 > > > Qemu test results: > > > total: 139 pass: 137 fail: 2 > > > Failed tests: > > > mips64:malta_defconfig:nosmp > > > mips64:malta_defconfig:smp > > > > > > Qemu tests fail with: > > > > > > This architecture does not have kernel memory protection. > > > random: fast init done > > > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000a > > > > > > ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000a > > > > > > While tracking this down, I found commit 4e4636cf981b ("objtool: Enclose > > > contents of unreachable() macro in a block"), which says "... Guenter Roeck > > > reported a boot failure in mips64 ...". Go figure. Applying commit > > > 4e4636cf981b on top of v4.9.106-rc1 indeed fixes the problem. > > > > > > > An additional note: It appears that neither 009615ab7fd4 ("USB: serial: cp210x: > > use tcflag_t to fix incompatible pointer type") nor 0fde7ad71ee3 ("sparc64: Fix > > build warnings with gcc 7") made it into v4.9.106-rc1, even though you mentioned > > that they did, or at least I think you did. What happened ? > > I "switched" trees for 4.9 for this release. Those patches are still in > a queue, but I wanted to have this release only be about the objtool > changes to make it easier to narrow down any potential issues. I'll do > a new 4.9 release after this one with those patches in it. > NP. I just sent you a couple of additional gcc releated patches. Hope this will be the final set. Thanks, Guenter