From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751840AbeFEMQ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:16:27 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:43862 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751779AbeFEMQ0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2018 08:16:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2018 14:16:23 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Mark Rutland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boqun Feng , Will Deacon , Andrea Parri Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] atomics/treewide: rework ordering barriers Message-ID: <20180605121623.GI12258@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180529180746.29684-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> <20180529180746.29684-3-mark.rutland@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180529180746.29684-3-mark.rutland@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 07:07:41PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > +#ifndef __atomic_mb__after_acquire > +#define __atomic_mb__after_acquire smp_mb__after_atomic > +#endif > + > +#ifndef __atomic_mb__before_release > +#define __atomic_mb__before_release smp_mb__before_atomic > +#endif > + > +#ifndef __atomic_mb__before_fence > +#define __atomic_mb__before_fence smp_mb__before_atomic > +#endif > + > +#ifndef __atomic_mb__after_fence > +#define __atomic_mb__after_fence smp_mb__after_atomic > +#endif I really _really_ dislike those names.. because they imply providing an MB before/after something else. But that is exactly what they do not. How about: __atomic_acquire_fence __atomic_release_fence for the acquire/release things, and simply using smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic for the full fence, its exactly what they were made for.