From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: smtp.codeaurora.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="dRJ3BYV5" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 1893E601D2 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932640AbeFFKvN (ORCPT + 25 others); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 06:51:13 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:45564 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932428AbeFFKvM (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 06:51:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 12:50:59 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Adrian Hunter Cc: Andi Kleen , Thomas Gleixner , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alexander Shishkin , Dave Hansen , Joerg Roedel , Jiri Olsa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 02/17] kallsyms, x86: Export addresses of syscall trampolines Message-ID: <20180606105059.GF12198@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1526986485-6562-1-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <1526986485-6562-3-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com> <20180605160043.GC7220@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <57f1e61f-49fa-99be-6876-48775272ccec@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57f1e61f-49fa-99be-6876-48775272ccec@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 11:02:08AM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 05/06/18 19:00, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 > >> +int arch_get_kallsym(unsigned int symnum, unsigned long *value, char *type, > >> + char *name) > >> +{ > >> + unsigned int cpu, ncpu; > >> + > >> + if (symnum >= num_possible_cpus()) > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + > >> + for (cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_possible_mask), ncpu = 0; > >> + cpu < num_possible_cpus() && ncpu < symnum; > >> + cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask), ncpu++) > >> + ; > > > > That is max_t(unsigned, cpumask_last(cpu_possible_mask), symnum) > > I think it should be: > > - cpu < num_possible_cpus() && ncpu < symnum; > + ncpu < symnum; Since we're bike-shedding: for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { if (ncpu++ >= symnum) break; }