From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Fix bandwidth timer clock drift condition
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:16:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180618091618.21480-1-xlpang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
The current condition to judge clock drift in expire_cfs_rq_runtime()
is wrong, the two runtime_expires are actually the same when clock
drift happens, so this condtion can never hit. The orginal design was
correctly done by commit a9cf55b28610 ("sched: Expire invalid runtime"),
but was changed to be the current one due to its locking issue.
This patch introduces another way, it adds a new field in both structure
cfs_rq and cfs_bandwidth to record the expiration update sequence, and
use them to figure out if clock drift happens(true if they equal).
This fix is also needed by the following patch.
Fixes: 51f2176d74ac ("sched/fair: Fix unlocked reads of some cfs_b->quota/period")
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++++------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e497c05aab7f..9f384264e832 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4590,6 +4590,7 @@ void __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
now = sched_clock_cpu(smp_processor_id());
cfs_b->runtime = cfs_b->quota;
cfs_b->runtime_expires = now + ktime_to_ns(cfs_b->period);
+ cfs_b->expires_seq++;
}
static inline struct cfs_bandwidth *tg_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg)
@@ -4612,6 +4613,7 @@ static int assign_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
struct task_group *tg = cfs_rq->tg;
struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(tg);
u64 amount = 0, min_amount, expires;
+ int expires_seq;
/* note: this is a positive sum as runtime_remaining <= 0 */
min_amount = sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice() - cfs_rq->runtime_remaining;
@@ -4629,6 +4631,7 @@ static int assign_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
}
}
expires = cfs_b->runtime_expires;
+ expires_seq = cfs_b->expires_seq;
raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
cfs_rq->runtime_remaining += amount;
@@ -4637,8 +4640,10 @@ static int assign_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
* spread between our sched_clock and the one on which runtime was
* issued.
*/
- if ((s64)(expires - cfs_rq->runtime_expires) > 0)
+ if ((s64)(expires - cfs_rq->runtime_expires) > 0) {
cfs_rq->runtime_expires = expires;
+ cfs_rq->expires_seq = expires_seq;
+ }
return cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0;
}
@@ -4664,12 +4669,9 @@ static void expire_cfs_rq_runtime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
* has not truly expired.
*
* Fortunately we can check determine whether this the case by checking
- * whether the global deadline has advanced. It is valid to compare
- * cfs_b->runtime_expires without any locks since we only care about
- * exact equality, so a partial write will still work.
+ * whether the global deadline(cfs_b->expires_seq) has advanced.
*/
-
- if (cfs_rq->runtime_expires != cfs_b->runtime_expires) {
+ if (cfs_rq->expires_seq == cfs_b->expires_seq) {
/* extend local deadline, drift is bounded above by 2 ticks */
cfs_rq->runtime_expires += TICK_NSEC;
} else {
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 6601baf2361c..e977e04f8daf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -334,9 +334,10 @@ struct cfs_bandwidth {
u64 runtime;
s64 hierarchical_quota;
u64 runtime_expires;
+ int expires_seq;
- int idle;
- int period_active;
+ short idle;
+ short period_active;
struct hrtimer period_timer;
struct hrtimer slack_timer;
struct list_head throttled_cfs_rq;
@@ -551,6 +552,7 @@ struct cfs_rq {
#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
int runtime_enabled;
+ int expires_seq;
u64 runtime_expires;
s64 runtime_remaining;
--
2.14.1.40.g8e62ba1
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-18 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 9:16 Xunlei Pang [this message]
2018-06-18 18:44 ` bsegall
2018-06-19 2:57 ` Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180618091618.21480-1-xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®