From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: Use logical or instead of addition for badr address calculation
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:14:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619171424.GA16846@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180619151235.GH17671@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 04:12:35PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> So, I'm going to continue sitting on the fence on this, and basically
> take the attitude that it's better that people don't use the new
> binutils until binutils people can provide us with an officially
> sanctioned solution that's going to work for both older and future
> assemblers.
>
I would so much love if people were working together instead of against
each other :-(. Never mind, I'll try a toolchain with binutils 2.28.1.
At least that is still supported with buildroot.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-19 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-19 5:07 Guenter Roeck
2018-06-19 7:48 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-19 7:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-19 13:29 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-06-19 13:35 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-19 15:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-06-19 17:14 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-06-19 18:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-06-19 17:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-06-19 18:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-19 18:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-06-19 18:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180619171424.GA16846@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®