mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Alistair Strachan <astrachan@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
	"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
	"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ashmem: Fix mmap size validation
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:56:03 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619225603.GB23389@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180619222444.134928-1-astrachan@google.com>

On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 03:24:44PM -0700, Alistair Strachan wrote:
> The ashmem driver did not check that the size/offset of the vma passed
> to its .mmap() function was not larger than the ashmem object being
> mapped. This could cause mmap() to succeed, even though accessing parts
> of the mapping would later fail with a segmentation fault.
> 
> Ensure an error is returned by the ashmem_mmap() function if the vma
> size is larger than the ashmem object size. This enables safer handling
> of the problem in userspace.

Is this going to break current users of this api as their original call
was succeeding?

> 
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>
> Cc: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
> Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
> Cc: kernel-team@android.com
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Strachan <astrachan@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
> index a1a0025b59e0..1eeedb529a10 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c
> @@ -366,6 +366,12 @@ static int ashmem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* requested mapping size larger than object size */
> +	if (unlikely(vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start > PAGE_ALIGN(asma->size))) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}

Unless you can measure the speed difference, never use likely/unlikely.
The CPU and compiler almost always knows how to do this better than we
do.  I know there are other checks like this in this function, those
should also be fixed as well.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-19 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-19 22:24 Alistair Strachan
2018-06-19 22:56 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2018-06-20  0:02   ` Alistair Strachan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180619225603.GB23389@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=astrachan@google.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maco@android.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®