From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7880BC43140 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D762219A2 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fD4p1JbX" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2D762219A2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754178AbeFUSFV (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:05:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39698 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752650AbeFUSFU (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:05:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [104.132.1.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE8652199D; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 18:05:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1529604320; bh=QlKvFfMSBgsbMyfNDYdmUrTncJImvRb0WNtgQrjQW6o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=fD4p1JbXGYFMtdOJw4iUADv/cA0qsbpkvr8te+TfLlu3ExKqHFpia363XR4HnuBjN JH5umt5hdqIH3rKHgWNYb7KCg6NvPRvS9EipW+p66E6NB4Nlo+EdBOGMPS5TSVsdwM 5Tv5d4cbjv04uBpWk3YpzGvwkqtZ5qzSOMbKLGPk= From: Jaegeuk Kim To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Jaegeuk Kim Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: don't issue discard commands in online discard is on Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 11:05:18 -0700 Message-Id: <20180621180518.76856-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Actually, we don't need to issue discard commands, if discard is on, as mentioned in the comment. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- fs/f2fs/segment.c | 21 +++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index 6dbdf2c48fba..553075973be4 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c @@ -2469,23 +2469,24 @@ int f2fs_trim_fs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct fstrim_range *range) if (err) goto out; - start_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, start_segno); - end_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, end_segno + 1); - - __init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_FSTRIM, cpc.trim_minlen); - __issue_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy, start_block, end_block); - /* * We filed discard candidates, but actually we don't need to wait for * all of them, since they'll be issued in idle time along with runtime * discard option. User configuration looks like using runtime discard * or periodic fstrim instead of it. */ - if (!test_opt(sbi, DISCARD)) { - trimmed = __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy, + if (test_opt(sbi, DISCARD)) + goto out; + + start_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, start_segno); + end_block = START_BLOCK(sbi, end_segno + 1); + + __init_discard_policy(sbi, &dpolicy, DPOLICY_FSTRIM, cpc.trim_minlen); + __issue_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy, start_block, end_block); + + trimmed = __wait_discard_cmd_range(sbi, &dpolicy, start_block, end_block); - range->len = F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(trimmed); - } + range->len = F2FS_BLK_TO_BYTES(trimmed); out: return err; } -- 2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog