mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shakeelb@google.com,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: revert mem_cgroup_put() introduction
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 08:47:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201806230844.RXx55fMi%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180623000600.5818-1-guro@fb.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3828 bytes --]

Hi Roman,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on next-20180622]
[cannot apply to linus/master v4.18-rc1 v4.17 v4.17-rc7 v4.18-rc1]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Roman-Gushchin/mm-revert-mem_cgroup_put-introduction/20180623-080942
config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make ARCH=i386 

Note: the linux-review/Roman-Gushchin/mm-revert-mem_cgroup_put-introduction/20180623-080942 HEAD 76214420a3e55c42797f5f22cb04d1a3331c1ece builds fine.
      It only hurts bisectibility.

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   mm/oom_kill.c: In function 'oom_kill_memcg_victim':
>> mm/oom_kill.c:1026:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'mem_cgroup_put'; did you mean 'mem_cgroup_id'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     mem_cgroup_put(oc->chosen_memcg);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     mem_cgroup_id
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +1026 mm/oom_kill.c

4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15   997  
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15   998  static bool oom_kill_memcg_victim(struct oom_control *oc)
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15   999  {
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1000  	if (oc->chosen_memcg == NULL || oc->chosen_memcg == INFLIGHT_VICTIM)
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1001  		return oc->chosen_memcg;
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1002  
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1003  	/*
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1004  	 * If memory.oom_group is set, kill all tasks belonging to the sub-tree
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1005  	 * of the chosen memory cgroup, otherwise kill the task with the biggest
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1006  	 * memory footprint.
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1007  	 */
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1008  	if (mem_cgroup_oom_group(oc->chosen_memcg)) {
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1009  		mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(oc->chosen_memcg, oom_kill_memcg_member,
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1010  				      NULL);
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1011  		/* We have one or more terminating processes at this point. */
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1012  		oc->chosen_task = INFLIGHT_VICTIM;
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1013  	} else {
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1014  		oc->chosen_points = 0;
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1015  		oc->chosen_task = NULL;
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1016  		mem_cgroup_scan_tasks(oc->chosen_memcg, oom_evaluate_task, oc);
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1017  
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1018  		if (oc->chosen_task == NULL ||
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1019  		    oc->chosen_task == INFLIGHT_VICTIM)
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1020  			goto out;
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1021  
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1022  		__oom_kill_process(oc->chosen_task);
7388c5c4 Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1023  	}
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1024  
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1025  out:
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15 @1026  	mem_cgroup_put(oc->chosen_memcg);
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1027  	return oc->chosen_task;
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1028  }
4ac2c83a Roman Gushchin 2018-06-15  1029  

:::::: The code at line 1026 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 4ac2c83a8e8a0708278b6f2bb44dc4c880fdcaf6 mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer

:::::: TO: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
:::::: CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 6356 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-23  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-19  5:13 [PATCH v6 0/3] Directed kmem charging Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19  5:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: memcg: remote memcg charging for kmem allocations Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 16:24   ` Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19 23:31     ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-20 15:22       ` Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19  5:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: fsnotify: account fsnotify metadata to kmemcg Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19  7:20   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-06-19 14:15     ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19  5:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs, mm: account buffer_head " Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 16:27   ` Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19 17:40     ` Roman Gushchin
2018-06-19 19:51       ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-19 19:55         ` Roman Gushchin
2018-06-22 23:33           ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-23  0:05             ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: revert mem_cgroup_put() introduction Roman Gushchin
2018-06-23  0:06               ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: introduce mem_cgroup_put() helper Roman Gushchin
2018-06-23  0:10                 ` Shakeel Butt
2018-06-23  0:47               ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-06-19 16:11 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] Directed kmem charging Johannes Weiner
2018-06-19 22:58   ` Shakeel Butt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201806230844.RXx55fMi%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®