From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E50C43142 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AC925F92 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WrsviBJ8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 21AC925F92 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965074AbeFYRmB (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:42:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55802 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965030AbeFYRl5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:41:57 -0400 Received: from jouet.infradead.org (unknown [177.79.80.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B5CD25F77; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 17:41:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1529948516; bh=ZltD77OkN+1yvkr+MqP4TKSIpwhHXU/n3mHBuVQ5Mp0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WrsviBJ8Yzeg+26O6BPpQgYaGv4XHXqgnsWGvpyvYTmqtTlDKKFuQfDp7pHsPdzcb yPgfoizuGSuftT01Cf4H82I1dHHpXQtG/3d52mmo2gg0UX2Onu4jhffbzpT9zP6CCM ovm31oZ8KhhSHCdafaZdrCha2eamZa68ox2wAgns= From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Alexander Shishkin , David Ahern , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: [PATCH 16/19] perf bench: Fix numa report output code Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:40:42 -0300 Message-Id: <20180625174045.25765-17-acme@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.3 In-Reply-To: <20180625174045.25765-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20180625174045.25765-1-acme@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jiri Olsa Currently we can hit following assert when running numa bench: $ perf bench numa mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZ0cm --thp 1 perf: bench/numa.c:1577: __bench_numa: Assertion `!(!(((wait_stat) & 0x7f) == 0))' failed. The assertion is correct, because we hit the SIGFPE in following line: Thread 2.2 "thread 0/0" received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffd28c6700 (LWP 11750)] 0x000.. in worker_thread (__tdata=0x7.. ) at bench/numa.c:1257 1257 td->speed_gbs = bytes_done / (td->runtime_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC) / 1e9; We don't check if the runtime is actually bigger than 1 second, and thus this might end up with zero division within FPU. Adding the check to prevent this. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: David Ahern Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180620094036.17278-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index 63eb49082774..44195514b19e 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata) u8 *global_data; u8 *process_data; u8 *thread_data; - u64 bytes_done; + u64 bytes_done, secs; long work_done; u32 l; struct rusage rusage; @@ -1254,7 +1254,8 @@ static void *worker_thread(void *__tdata) timersub(&stop, &start0, &diff); td->runtime_ns = diff.tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC; td->runtime_ns += diff.tv_usec * NSEC_PER_USEC; - td->speed_gbs = bytes_done / (td->runtime_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC) / 1e9; + secs = td->runtime_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC; + td->speed_gbs = secs ? bytes_done / secs / 1e9 : 0; getrusage(RUSAGE_THREAD, &rusage); td->system_time_ns = rusage.ru_stime.tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC; -- 2.14.3