From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2185FC43144 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 22:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1236261C4 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 22:16:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D1236261C4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754723AbeFYWQl (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:16:41 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53754 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752625AbeFYWQk (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:16:40 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-56-78.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.56.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81F21261C3; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 22:16:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 18:16:38 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , joel@joelfernandes.org, Byungchul Park , byungchul park , Lai Jiangshan , Josh Triplett , Mathieu Desnoyers , LKML , kernel-team@lge.com Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] rcu: Remove ->dynticks_nmi_nesting from struct rcu_dynticks Message-ID: <20180625181638.7fb84df6@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20180620164902.GW3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180622055659.GA255098@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> <20180622132843.GN3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180622181916.GA13628@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> <20180622143247.781028b1@gandalf.local.home> <20180622200548.GA114655@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> <20180625082824.GB21377@X58A-UD3R> <20180625163951.GA52646@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com> <20180625162557.7140664c@gandalf.local.home> <20180625204708.GS3593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 13:47:45 -0700 Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > As a straightforward example, NMI and MCE can nest inside each other. But I'm not sure how stable the machine becomes when MCE's start interrupting NMIs. Also, can MCE callbacks use RCU? > IIRC we treat #DB somewhat NMI-ish-ly as well. And #DB is something I think we finally said shouldn't be done in NMIs, IIRC. -- Steve