From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0366CC43144 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6387273BD for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="NW6/yfbj" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A6387273BD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935016AbeF1NDD (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:03:03 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:56528 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933090AbeF1NDC (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 09:03:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Q7okRLbnM87Hz+NWLiCimxVRQSCMaYUKuGsQ522+NbA=; b=NW6/yfbjrwQ0OkkuWwM5GXseQ K1/VL83Abumfgt9sh+OvrgHUqD4OmrHLkAIF1PM1QCZCi2xlRH24zdPhODAADY60rp8jp8RR/mM6l jvFYuNfd1503woC0waet5gIfWk2QsApWy7sS3Gc3C78J4kDGnNoYrwJ0ERx/2xCVGGuafjKBITLZO CqNMhicDZc9cWThzhD5eLaBZCS2i2E9z8oYoUad3QlnyWrOsDlAn0t+bNf9O6s/61tJny30LTDr1U 9DZgCaBF7Mn9p9D5rcBtTugeefN0Tkou692W1d/co7zrfJKYB7bhoA90kv9kW4TFJ8lRii/Ixt2KZ joXlTadjQ==; Received: from willy by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fYWZe-00061B-QA; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:02:58 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 06:02:58 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Andrea Parri Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Alan Stern , Boqun Feng , Nicholas Piggin , David Howells , Jade Alglave , Luc Maranget , "Paul E . McKenney" , Akira Yokosawa , Daniel Lustig , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] locking: Clarify requirements for smp_mb__after_spinlock() Message-ID: <20180628130258.GF7646@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <1530182480-13205-1-git-send-email-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> <1530182480-13205-3-git-send-email-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1530182480-13205-3-git-send-email-andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:41:19PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote: > + * smp_mb__after_spinlock() provides a full memory barrier between po-earlier > + * lock acquisitions and po-later memory accesses. What does po-earlier mean? Partial order?