From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B7FC43144 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D72D23D93 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:21:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4D72D23D93 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755357AbeF2OVd (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:21:33 -0400 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:26381 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752260AbeF2OVc (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:21:32 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jun 2018 07:21:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,285,1526367600"; d="scan'208";a="68364621" Received: from kuha.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.189]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2018 07:21:28 -0700 Received: by kuha.fi.intel.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:21:27 +0300 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:21:27 +0300 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Guenter Roeck , Hans de Goede , Jun Li , Mats Karrman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] usb: typec: Support for Alternate Modes Message-ID: <20180629142127.GB21104@kuha.fi.intel.com> References: <20180627151953.30942-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180627151953.30942-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi guys, On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 06:19:45PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > Hi, > > Since we now have an implementation for an actual alternate mode (DisplayPort), > I guess there is no reason to send another RFC. This series is the same as the > last RFC proposal [1] with only minor changes. There were only a few comments. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/8/225 > > I've tested these with a platform that has fusb302, and also with UCSI > platforms. The UCSI driver will need separate support for alternate modes that > I'm not including to this series. I'm still working on it. I've used various > DisplayPort to Type-C adapters for testing, both DisplayPort receptacles and > connectors. I'm travelling next week so there may be some delay in my replies. I'm actually also on vacation, so I may not answer immediately also because of that. Cheers, -- heikki