mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>,
	Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mei: bus: type promotion bug in mei_nfc_if_version()
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:16:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180704121600.hrezydpvpe4hyie3@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807041358580.4387@hadrien>

On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:59:14PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > We accidentally removed the check for negative returns without
> > considering the issue of type promotion.  The "if_version_length"
> > variable is type size_t so if __mei_cl_recv() returns a negative then
> > "bytes_recv" is type promoted to a high positive value and treated as
> > success.
> >
> > Fixes: 582ab27a063a ("mei: bus: fix received data size check in NFC fixup")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/bus-fixup.c b/drivers/misc/mei/bus-fixup.c
> > index 0208c4b027c5..fa0236a5e59a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/mei/bus-fixup.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/mei/bus-fixup.c
> > @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int mei_nfc_if_version(struct mei_cl *cl,
> >
> >  	ret = 0;
> >  	bytes_recv = __mei_cl_recv(cl, (u8 *)reply, if_version_length, 0);
> > -	if (bytes_recv < if_version_length) {
> > +	if (bytes_recv < 0 || bytes_recv < if_version_length) {
> 
> Is this preferred to adding an int cast?

I don't think it matters.  I kind of like explicitly testing for
negative but maybe later people will just remove the check like we did
here?  You could do it a bunch of different ways:

1: if (ret < 0 || ret < ARRAY_SIZE(xxx))
2: if (ret < (int)ARRAY_SIZE(xxx))
3: if (ret != ARRAY_SIZE(xxx))

They're all equivalent.  I guess I don't like casting too much.  My
first approach to fixing this was just to declare if_version_length as
an int, but then I saw that originally there was a "bytes_recv < 0"
check and decided to go that way instead.


regards,
dan carpenter

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-04 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-04  9:34 Dan Carpenter
2018-07-04 11:59 ` Julia Lawall
2018-07-04 12:16   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2018-07-04 13:57     ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-07-04 14:15       ` Dan Carpenter
2018-07-04 14:25         ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-07-04 14:45           ` Julia Lawall
2018-07-07 15:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-07-09 11:36   ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-07-09 12:03     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180704121600.hrezydpvpe4hyie3@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®