From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CFEC6778A for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52C624110 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:32:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B52C624110 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753779AbeGEPc6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2018 11:32:58 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51978 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753642AbeGEPcz (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2018 11:32:55 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81197A9; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 08:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.211.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C47863F5BA; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 08:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 16:32:49 +0100 From: Quentin Perret To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, thara.gopinath@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, tkjos@google.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, smuckle@google.com, adharmap@quicinc.com, skannan@quicinc.com, pkondeti@codeaurora.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, edubezval@gmail.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, currojerez@riseup.net, javi.merino@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/12] PM: Introduce an Energy Model management framework Message-ID: <20180705153249.GH32579@e108498-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20180628114043.24724-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> <20180628114043.24724-4-quentin.perret@arm.com> <20180705150629.GP2458@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180705150629.GP2458@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 05 Jul 2018 at 17:06:29 (+0200), Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:40:34PM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote: > > +/* fd_update_cs_table() - Computes the capacity values of a cs_table > > + * > > + * This assumes a linear relation between capacity and frequency. As such, > > + * the capacity of a CPU at the n^th capacity state is computed as: > > + * capactity(n) = max_capacity * freq(n) / freq_max > > + */ > > Broken comment style > > > +static void fd_update_cs_table(struct em_cs_table *cs_table, int cpu) > > +{ > > + unsigned long cmax = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, cpu); > > + int max_cap_state = cs_table->nr_cap_states - 1; > > + unsigned long fmax = cs_table->state[max_cap_state].frequency; > > + int i; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < cs_table->nr_cap_states; i++) { > > + u64 cap = (u64)cmax * cs_table->state[i].frequency; > > + do_div(cap, fmax); > > + cs_table->state[i].capacity = (unsigned long)cap; > > I prefer div64_*() over do_div(), the calling convention the latter > always confuses the heck out of me. > > So this then becomes something like: > > cs_table->state[i].capacity = > div64_u64(cmax * cs_table->state[i].frequency, fmax); Ok, I'll change both. Thanks, Quentin