mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Glexiner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:21:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180711232120.5dbfa1c7@vmware.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180711205249.GA32091@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:52:49 -0700
Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:

> > #define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
> > 	extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##name;			\
> > 	static inline void trace_##name(proto)				\
> > 	{								\
> > 		if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key))		\
> > 			__DO_TRACE(&__tracepoint_##name,		\
> > 				TP_PROTO(data_proto),			\
> > 				TP_ARGS(data_args),			\
> > 				TP_CONDITION(cond), 0);			\
> > 		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && (cond)) {		\
> > 			rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace();			\
> > 			rcu_dereference_sched(__tracepoint_##name.funcs);\
> > 			rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace();		\
> > 		}							\
> > 	}
> > 
> > Because lockdep would only trigger warnings when the tracepoint was
> > enabled and used in a place it shouldn't be, we added the above
> > IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) part to test regardless if the the
> > tracepoint was enabled or not. Because we do this, we don't need to
> > have the test in the __DO_TRACE() code itself. That means we can clean
> > up the code as per Peter's suggestion.  
> 
> Sounds good, I'm Ok with making this change.
> 
> Just to clarify, are you proposing to change the rcu_dereference_sched to
> rcu_dereference_raw in both __DECLARE_TRACE and __DO_TRACE?

No, just in __DO_TRACE(). The rcu_dereference_sched() above in
__DECLARE_TRACE() in the if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) block is
required to show the warnings if trace_##name() is used wrong, and is
the reason we can use rcu_dereference_raw() in __DO_TRACE() in the
first place ;-)

This brings up another point. We should probably add to
__DECLARE_TRACE_RCU() this:

#ifndef MODULE
#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
	static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto)		\
	{								\
		if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key))		\
			__DO_TRACE(&__tracepoint_##name,		\
				TP_PROTO(data_proto),			\
				TP_ARGS(data_args),			\
				TP_CONDITION(cond), 1);			\
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && (cond)) {		\
+			int idx;					\
+			idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu); \
+			srcu_dereference_notrace(__tracepoint_##name.funcs, \
+						&tracepoint_srcu);	\
+			srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, idx); \
+		}							\
	}
#else


So that lockdep works with trace_##name##__rcuidle() when the trace
event is not enabled.

But that should be a separate patch and not part of this series. I may
write that up tomorrow.

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-12  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-28 18:21 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] srcu: Add notrace variants of srcu_read_{lock,unlock} Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] srcu: Add notrace variant of srcu_dereference Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] trace/irqsoff: Split reset into separate functions Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 12:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:00     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 14:27       ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 14:46         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 15:15           ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-11 20:56             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  1:22               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  2:35                 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 20:52           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  3:21             ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2018-07-12  4:28               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 13:35                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 19:17                   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 20:15                     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12 20:29                       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 20:31                         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 12:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-12  2:32     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 12:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 15:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 15:26         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 16:46           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-11 16:40         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2018-07-12  0:31       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12  1:26         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage Joel Fernandes
2018-07-06 22:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-07  4:20     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-10 14:20   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-10 17:33     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11 13:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-11 13:19     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11 13:22       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  8:38       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-12 13:37         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-12  0:44     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for testing preemptoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  0:47   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11  5:26     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-06-28 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] kselftests: Add tests for the preemptoff and irqsoff tracers Joel Fernandes
2018-07-11  0:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-11  5:27     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-07-03 14:15 ` [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq tracepoints Joel Fernandes
2018-07-03 14:23   ` Steven Rostedt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-21 22:32 Joel Fernandes
2018-06-21 22:32 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38 [PATCH v9 0/7] Centralize and unify usage of preempt/irq Joel Fernandes
2018-06-07 20:38 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] tracepoint: Make rcuidle tracepoint callers use SRCU Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180711232120.5dbfa1c7@vmware.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=julia@ni.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome