From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FDFEECDFB8 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2848320852 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="p/VBtyWN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2848320852 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388287AbeGWPP6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:15:58 -0400 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]:40034 "EHLO lelv0142.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388102AbeGWPP6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2018 11:15:58 -0400 Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6NEEDCN068483; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:14:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1532355253; bh=DdR/A2jd1TP/9FvA327CtC+H4W7Jqq2lCGl0uc/qhwg=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=p/VBtyWN8hBCPeSIa8WITALgM1WK6DyAWcTA3WVaq0A3BZ95ByQhyl6ooOiiXTCkU 0VgA3HZTtvfI7ZW0oLyWeEsew/LPkyJcgKk778gHVYOzDtrtsMGV9EYEcTx559HWDG qzxqoYb7GqLWavDQp5ju8qDAij4XAtiIQzbgku24= Received: from DFLE108.ent.ti.com (dfle108.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.29]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6NEED6T023514; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:14:13 -0500 Received: from DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) by DFLE108.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:14:12 -0500 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:14:13 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w6NEECQp008249; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:14:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:14:12 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Jassi Brar CC: Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , Suman Anna , Tero Kristo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Devicetree List , ", linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Add support for AM654 Secure Proxy Message-ID: <20180723141412.7zd6wp6y6pql7bm7@kahuna> References: <20180716180607.16526-1-nm@ti.com> <20180723132956.tcsuxychhlhiwz6v@kahuna> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170714-126-deb55f (1.8.3) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13:56-20180723, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: [...] > >> .../bindings/mailbox/ti,secure-proxy.txt | 50 +++ > >> drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c | 353 +++++++++++++++++---- > >> 2 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/ti,secure-proxy.txt > > > > > > Jassi, > > > > I dont see this in next-20180723. You'd asked me to hold off on pings > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/16/353 -> so, held off as much as I could > > before wondering on the status. > > > I didn't ask you to not ping me. I said I didn't miss your patchset. I > still didn't. > > Especially for purely platform specific changes, that I don't have > knowledge about, I leave them to cook in public as long as possible, > before pulling them in around rc7. Understood. Thanks. > You submitted V2, 7days ago only and we are at rc6 today. So chill. v2 is just wording of mailbox node example change recommended by Rob. I was hoping to get any further changes prior to reposting a v2.. but anyways.. Looks all good.. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon