From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, vincent.weaver@maine.edu,
jolsa@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/perf/intel: Introduce PMU flag for Extended PEBS
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 17:50:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180723155056.GF2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e17eba6-6fed-f283-ee33-47db333398e2@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:43:56AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > So I like PEBS_ALL.. what I don't like is that it seems to be mutually
> > exclusive with PEBS Load Latency.
>
> Right, MSR_PEBS_ENABLE:32-35 is model specific.
Doesn't mean they couldn't have avoided conflicting bits.
> For Atom,
> Goldmont and earlier platform, they are reserved.
> Goldmont Plus, 32-34 are for fixed counter, 35 is reserved.
> For Core,
> from Nehalem to latest 8th, 32-35 are for Load Latency.
Seems rather unfortunate to me. Because PEBS_ALL is good, but since they
took conflicting bits, we'll have yet another variant when/if (I hope
they do) they bring it to Core :/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-23 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-09 2:15 kan.liang
2018-03-09 2:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/perf/intel: Support PEBS on fixed counters kan.liang
2018-07-25 14:32 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-09 2:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf/x86/intel/ds: Handle PEBS overflow for " kan.liang
2018-07-23 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-23 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-23 16:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-23 16:56 ` Liang, Kan
2018-07-23 17:15 ` Liang, Kan
2018-07-25 14:33 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-03-09 2:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf/x86/intel: Support Extended PEBS for Goldmont Plus kan.liang
2018-07-25 14:33 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2018-07-23 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/perf/intel: Introduce PMU flag for Extended PEBS Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-23 15:43 ` Liang, Kan
2018-07-23 15:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-07-25 14:31 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel: " tip-bot for Kan Liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180723155056.GF2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome