From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=hTZH=KI=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E29DC6778A
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 13:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E77320875
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 13:57:14 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9E77320875
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S2388448AbeGXPDs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:03:48 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:44121 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S2388395AbeGXPDs (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:03:48 -0400
Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80)
        (envelope-from <bigeasy@linutronix.de>)
        id 1fhxoI-0001jL-Ka; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:57:06 +0200
Date:   Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:57:06 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT v2] arm64: fpsimd: use a local_lock() in addition to
 local_bh_disable()
Message-ID: <20180724135706.nn2exgz53o7jfwm4@linutronix.de>
References: <20180522172115.fpqguqlsq6bavtxy@linutronix.de>
 <20180522132429.6f1dcf92@gandalf.local.home>
 <20180522173333.aawadhkcekzvrswp@linutronix.de>
 <20180711092555.268adf7f@gandalf.local.home>
 <20180711133157.bvrza5vmthu6lwjd@linutronix.de>
 <20180711093346.782af07a@gandalf.local.home>
 <20180713174937.5ddaqpylalcmc3jq@linutronix.de>
 <20180716151737.GO9486@e103592.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20180718091209.u76gzacanj5avhdl@linutronix.de>
 <20180724094623.37430032@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
In-Reply-To: <20180724094623.37430032@gandalf.local.home>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2018-07-24 09:46:23 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Unfortunately yes.
> 
> Then we need to find another solution, because this is way too ugly and
> as Dave said, fragile to keep.

Yes. I have something new where Mike said it works (while this causes
Mike's gcc to segfault). Need to test this myself…

> How does local_lock_bh() do a +3 (not seeing it in the code). And

get_local_var() +1
spin_lock_bh() +2 because
	local_bh_disable() +1
	spin_lock() +1

Sebastian