From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Tino Lehnig <tino.lehnig@contabo.de>,
ngupta@vflare.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Zram writeback feature unstable with heavy swap utilization - BUG: Bad page state in process...
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 19:55:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180725025525.GD16271@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180725025106.GA99093@rodete-desktop-imager.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:51:06AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 07:35:32PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > There is NOTHING in a union with _refcount.
>
> Confusing. Matthew, what am I missing?
>
> Before:
>
> counters consumes 8 bytes
> units and _refcount consumes each 4 bytes so memory space is not overlapped.
Correct. _mapcount is at offset 24, as is units. _refcount is at offset 28.
> union {
> unsigned long counters;
> struct {
> union {
> atomic_t _mapcount;
> int units; /* SLOB */
> };
> atomic_t _refcount;
> };
> };
>
>
> After:
>
> Now, units is overlapped with _refcount and _mapcount.
No. units is at offset 24, as is _mapcount. But _refcount is still at
offset 28.
> union {
> unsigned long counters;
> int units; /* SLOB */
> struct { /* Page cache */
> atomic_t _mapcount;
> atomic_t _refcount;
> };
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 2:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-23 12:29 Tino Lehnig
2018-07-24 1:03 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-24 2:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-07-24 6:47 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-24 7:30 ` Tino Lehnig
2018-07-25 1:32 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-25 1:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-07-25 2:16 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-25 2:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-07-25 2:51 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-25 2:55 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2018-07-25 3:02 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-25 2:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-07-25 4:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-07-25 13:21 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-25 15:12 ` Tino Lehnig
2018-07-26 2:03 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-26 6:10 ` Tino Lehnig
2018-07-26 6:21 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-26 6:34 ` Tino Lehnig
2018-07-26 10:00 ` Tino Lehnig
2018-07-26 10:30 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-26 12:35 ` Tino Lehnig
2018-07-27 9:14 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-27 11:00 ` Tino Lehnig
2018-07-27 12:05 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-27 12:13 ` Tino Lehnig
2018-07-27 22:58 ` Minchan Kim
2018-07-30 6:09 ` Tino Lehnig
2018-08-02 5:15 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180725025525.GD16271@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tino.lehnig@contabo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®