From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] x86/ftrace: fix live patching vs. tracing race
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:23:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180726102317.550c986d@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180726104029.7736-1-nstange@suse.de>
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 12:40:28 +0200
Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if a user starts to trace a live patched function, its mcount call will get
> redirected from a trampoline to ftrace_regs_caller.
>
> In preparation for that, ftrace on x86 first installs an int3 insn at that
> call site.
>
> ftrace_int3_handler() in turn simply skips over the mcount call insn,
> effectively reverting the livepatch for that function during
> ftrace_replace_code().
>
> This breaks KLP's consistency model.
>
>
> There are two possible options for fixing this:
> 1.) At the ftrace level.
> 2.) Search for a matching klp_ops from ftrace_int3_handler() and
> handle the redirection if needed.
>
> Both have their drawbacks, hence the RFC mode for this patch implementing
> 1.).
>
> The main disadvantage is that it doesn't work on 32 bits (c.f. the patch
> description), but for KLP this would be fine.
>
> OTOH, it keeps KLP specific code out of ftrace_int3_handler() and might
> perhaps be beneficial in other contexts as well.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
Thanks, I need to revisit this code. I have ideas that would fix this
problem and improve the live patching code generally.
I'm hoping to get to this within the next month.
-- Steve
>
> Nicolai
>
> Nicolai Stange (1):
> x86/ftrace: make ftrace_int3_handler() not to skip fops invocation
>
> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> arch/x86/kernel/ftrace_64.S | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-26 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 10:40 Nicolai Stange
2018-07-26 10:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] x86/ftrace: make ftrace_int3_handler() not to skip fops invocation Nicolai Stange
2019-04-19 20:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-23 18:15 ` Nicolai Stange
2019-04-23 23:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-04-24 6:20 ` Nicolai Stange
2019-04-24 12:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-07-26 14:23 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180726102317.550c986d@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®