From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523BCC43142 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 06:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9822098A for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 06:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tobin.cc header.i=@tobin.cc header.b="aCZ7BX0b"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="tG0fR33M" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ED9822098A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tobin.cc Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726906AbeHBISk (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2018 04:18:40 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:36859 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726187AbeHBISj (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Aug 2018 04:18:39 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D5321DE0; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 02:29:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 02 Aug 2018 02:29:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobin.cc; h=cc :date:from:message-id:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=n0dAtfn9iC6EO9Tq9hgZtvQ4/ij8r9gVDz4hoyCSE T4=; b=aCZ7BX0bbUS6nAg2C5Mq6YzmOmIIycBjDw0UIbwY/ZliWemk6CJdBs25c 1Cn+qkfWWiuVj/9QN8jRczlbd3tc3YBNRlqMRTF5xSW7LUmxgXL4VetloZnrroc8 BNsvaOg4mdXprOgEj/Ok1wMGUMnm1bgkq/GUAKK81AFUSrF4GTKYOurc3mW/qV4G 5aj0G0V7VyMmx5dZzWjfTaZxd6yjSSu7by9/PMhMYvcEbck6AwhNSrvgZe5HqBzv CwPoq8Fz2l8QjxAovOgUWBUzllo8JNLBsQLBKtxZjts4M7k99nypm7m+LJyurLfR FEbqPR1jmGSnZLNNh+LnPt0HUI5Zg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:date:from:message-id:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=n0dAtfn9iC6EO9Tq9 hgZtvQ4/ij8r9gVDz4hoyCSET4=; b=tG0fR33MF1ApGRFCWUnsJmc0P7YrNHze3 lmFzlMuJGKencsNFfUq5VqGf0hcfaIq8aAZ4UYPjGK6Ba9uRGAmaYqKKNUG/t/am j3zi0hed2zwBWNY27Y4Y7arvbFnGNdfIf/YfAVES8+XDjwM/yK7VXlKFP7QTwkGl TPJUcX5GR4aKOP3VX4DAw5vpHNlKLALg2RAPIyrlpigtnuMLJS4fjLrimNHUJaAc lb2+UEpoGCpydhWY2cDxHjg/nXy7+OwF17GxEPUznWGHYnFVNMaeug0syK/hBVFr mIT1Bj1aJ1PCDReLR//r5lE5/yerWym/lgs66n9DLGEaZAmZ5QnlA== X-ME-Proxy: X-ME-Sender: Received: from localhost (124-169-17-12.dyn.iinet.net.au [124.169.17.12]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B223CE4818; Thu, 2 Aug 2018 02:29:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tobin C. Harding" To: Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" , Jonathan Corbet , "David S. Miller" , Jay Schulist , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC bpf-next 0/3] docs: Convert filter.txt to RST Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 16:28:45 +1000 Message-Id: <20180802062848.14332-1-me@tobin.cc> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, This is a documentation RFC (come on now, serious faces please). It is an RFC for two reasons 1. The content is heavy and I don't fully understand it all, original authors are you ok with the document being split up like this? 2. I'm only the conversion monkey, I'd like someone with a bigger view of kernel docs in general to ok this please. This RFC came out of this patch set [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] docs: Convert BPF filter.txt to RST As such the first two patches are the only ones I could salvage from that set. Stating the obvious the mappings are: Patch 1 was [PATCH bpf-next 12/13] docs: net: Fix various minor typos Patch 2 was [PATCH bpf-next 09/13] docs: net: Use lowercase 'k' for kernel Patch 3 is the splitting of filter.txt into bpf/eBPF.rst and core-api/bpf.rst Again, stating the obvious, if this RFC is ok I'll redo all the other patches from the original set on top of this. thanks, Tobin. Tobin C. Harding (3): docs: net: Fix various minor typos docs: net: Use lowercase 'k' for kernel docs: Split filter.txt into separate documents. Documentation/networking/filter.txt | 1476 --------------------------- 1 file changed, 1476 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Documentation/networking/filter.txt -- 2.17.1