From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sfr@canb.auug.org.au, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] staging: erofs: disable compiling temporarile
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 22:34:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180802143455.9214-1-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
As Stephen Rothwell reported:
"After merging the staging tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_read_super':
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:343:17: error: 'MS_RDONLY' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IS_RDONLY'?
sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY | MS_NOATIME;
^~~~~~~~~
IS_RDONLY
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:343:17: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:343:29: error: 'MS_NOATIME' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'S_NOATIME'?
sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY | MS_NOATIME;
^~~~~~~~~~
S_NOATIME
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_mount':
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:501:10: warning: passing argument 5 of 'mount_bdev' makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
&priv, erofs_fill_super);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:0,
from drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:14:
include/linux/fs.h:2151:23: note: expected 'size_t {aka long unsigned int}' but argument is of type 'int (*)(struct super_block *, void *, int)'
extern struct dentry *mount_bdev(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:500:9: error: too few arguments to function 'mount_bdev'
return mount_bdev(fs_type, flags, dev_name,
^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:0,
from drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:14:
include/linux/fs.h:2151:23: note: declared here
extern struct dentry *mount_bdev(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: At top level:
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:518:20: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
.mount = erofs_mount,
^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:518:20: note: (near initialization for 'erofs_fs_type.mount')
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_remount':
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:630:12: error: 'MS_RDONLY' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'IS_RDONLY'?
*flags |= MS_RDONLY;
^~~~~~~~~
IS_RDONLY
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c: At top level:
drivers/staging/erofs/super.c:640:16: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
.remount_fs = erofs_remount,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
Caused by various commits creating erofs in the staging tree interacting
with various commits redoing the mount infrastructure in the vfs tree.
I have disabed CONFIG_EROFS_FS for now:"
The reason of compiling error is:
Since -next collects and merges developing patches including common vfs
stuff from multi-trees, but those patches didn't cover erofs, such as:
('vfs: Suppress MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled")
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=109b45090d7d3ce2797bb1ef7f70eead5bfe0ff3
("vfs: Require specification of size of mount data for internal mounts")
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=0a191e4505a4f255e6513b49426213da69bf0e80
Above vfs related patches has not been merged in staging tree, if we
submit those erofs patches to staging mailing list and after including
them in staging-{test,nexts} tree, it can easily cause compiling error.
We worked out some patches to adjust those vfs change, but now we just
submit them to -next tree temporarily to avoid compiling error.
For potentail conflict in between erofs and vfs changes in incoming
merge window, Stephen suggested that we can disable CONFIG_EROFS_FS
temporarily to pass merge window, and after that we can do restore by
reenabling CONFIG_EROFS_FS and applying those fixing patches. Also
Greg confirmed this solution.
So, let's disable compiling erofs for a while.
Suggested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
v3: remain "depends on BLOCK".
drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig
index 663b755bf2fb..b37d994aa687 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/staging/erofs/Kconfig
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
config EROFS_FS
tristate "EROFS filesystem support"
depends on BLOCK
+ depends on BROKEN
help
EROFS(Enhanced Read-Only File System) is a lightweight
read-only file system with modern designs (eg. page-sized
--
2.18.0
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-02 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-02 14:34 Chao Yu [this message]
2018-08-02 17:33 ` Greg KH
2018-08-03 1:18 ` Gao Xiang
2018-08-03 1:35 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180802143455.9214-1-chao@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gaoxiang25@huawei.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome