From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EFBC46471 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDC421A53 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:35:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7CDC421A53 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732864AbeHFRou (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2018 13:44:50 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39914 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732548AbeHFRot (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Aug 2018 13:44:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [194.244.16.108]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49E3BD01; Mon, 6 Aug 2018 15:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 17:35:08 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Dan Rue Cc: Naresh Kamboju , open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Guenter Roeck , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux- stable Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/124] 4.4.146-stable review Message-ID: <20180806153508.GB20862@kroah.com> References: <20180804082702.434482435@linuxfoundation.org> <20180805134952.GA15972@kroah.com> <20180805151933.efzi3mawp22p3wex@linode.therub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180805151933.efzi3mawp22p3wex@linode.therub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:19:33PM +0000, Dan Rue wrote: > On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 03:49:52PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 05:24:21PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On 4 August 2018 at 14:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.146 release. > > > > There are 124 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Mon Aug 6 08:26:39 UTC 2018. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.146-rc1.gz > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > > > No regressions on arm64, arm and x86_64. > > > > Really? How did you all miss the netfilter bug that was introduced by > > this series? > > > > Anyway, thanks for testing, but I'm worried... > > I took a look through our test suites to see where we may have coverage for > this. There is a netns series of tests in LTP [1], but we've had trouble > getting them running successfully in the past and so they are being skipped. I > don't know if it would have caught this particular issue, but I'll find out, > and also see if we can get them working and running again. > > We also run the net/ tests in kselftest, but there aren't that many, and of > course running kselftest the way we do is not a well supported usecase (running > all of 4.17 kselftest against 4.4 kernels, skipping tests that are broken). > > So I would ask, how would net/ expect such things to be tested, and what can we > do to help? I don't know. Somehow this was caught when running Android's userspace, which seems to be a great stress test for networking. What about running the Android networking tests on kernels? Those don't need to be run on an android system to work properly last I checked. thanks, greg k-h