mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
	dave.hansen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 19:50:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180806175013.GB2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533317992.28585.103.camel@surriel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 973 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 01:39:52PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > At the very least the Changelog needs to explain why we cannot do
> > away with the swizzle now and how doing the swizzle without the
> > refcounting is not completely broken (I think I see, but urgh).
> 
> The changelog for patches 9 & 10 explains, I think.

They hint at it :-)

> What is missing from my explanation?
> How would you like to see it explained?

Maybe a few words like:

"Since ->active_mm is still used in a few sites, we must keep the
current tracking, such that we will not hit a kthread's NULL mm. Note
that lazy_tlb_exit_mmap() switches ->active_mm to &init_mm before taking
out the lazy mm."

That said; I'm not entirely sure we'll actually touch active_mm if we're
not a user task. The perf thing for example will only touch active_mm
when user_mode(regs).

But whatever, this was the only hickup.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2018-08-06 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-01 10:02 [PATCH v2 0/11] x86,tlb,mm: more lazy TLB cleanups & optimizations Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86,tlb: clarify memory barrier in switch_mm_irqs_off Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/11] smp: use __cpumask_set_cpu in on_each_cpu_cond Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/11] smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86,mm: use on_each_cpu_cond for TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/11] mm,tlb: turn dummy defines into inline functions Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/11] mm,x86: skip cr4 and ldt reload when mm stays the same Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86,mm: remove leave_mm cpu argument Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/11] arch,mm: add config variable to skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/11] mm,x86: shoot down lazy TLB references at exit_mmap time Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86,tlb: really leave mm on shootdown Rik van Riel
2018-08-01 10:02 ` [PATCH 11/11] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-08-03 15:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-03 16:40     ` Rik van Riel
2018-08-03 17:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-03 17:39         ` Rik van Riel
2018-08-06 17:50           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180806175013.GB2476@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®