Re: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Use true and false for boolean values

[Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>]

On Sat, Aug 04, 2018 at 07:27:02PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Return statements in functions returning bool should use true or false
> instead of an integer value.
> 
> This code was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>

Looks good for me.
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>

Add Felix for his awareness.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> index 5d2475d..16af9d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/cik_event_interrupt.c
> @@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ static bool cik_event_interrupt_isr(struct kfd_dev *dev,
>  	vmid  = (ihre->ring_id & 0x0000ff00) >> 8;
>  	if (vmid < dev->vm_info.first_vmid_kfd ||
>  	    vmid > dev->vm_info.last_vmid_kfd)
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	/* If there is no valid PASID, it's likely a firmware bug */
>  	pasid = (ihre->ring_id & 0xffff0000) >> 16;
>  	if (WARN_ONCE(pasid == 0, "FW bug: No PASID in KFD interrupt"))
> -		return 0;
> +		return false;
>  
>  	/* Interrupt types we care about: various signals and faults.
>  	 * They will be forwarded to a work queue (see below).
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx