From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=852P=K4=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEF6C46464
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 16:36:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8C621564
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 16:36:26 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6C8C621564
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1730129AbeHMTTV (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:19:21 -0400
Received: from www.llwyncelyn.cymru ([82.70.14.225]:53798 "EHLO fuzix.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1728293AbeHMTTV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:19:21 -0400
Received: from alans-desktop (82-70-14-226.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.70.14.226])
        by fuzix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w7DGZ3em015022;
        Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:35:03 +0100
Date:   Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:35:02 +0100
From:   Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, SELinux-NSA <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>,
        Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
        tomoyo-dev-en@lists.sourceforge.jp,
        "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: BUG: Mount ignores mount options
Message-ID: <20180813173502.1a7a1d9c@alans-desktop>
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXC8Z-q+PzzqMC-McA7UdmFubVcs2dVsT0Dt+GbSqjF5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180810153902.GH21087@thunk.org>
        <87d0uqpba5.fsf@xmission.com>
        <153313703562.13253.5766498657900728120.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
        <22361.1533913891@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
        <28045.1533916438@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
        <20180810161400.GA627@thunk.org>
        <CALCETrXC8Z-q+PzzqMC-McA7UdmFubVcs2dVsT0Dt+GbSqjF5A@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Corporation
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> If the same block device is visible, with rw access, in two different
> containers, I don't see any anything good can happen.  Sure, with the

At the raw level there are lots of use cases involving high performance
data capture, media streaming and the like.

At the file system layer you can use GFS2 for example.

So there are cases where it's possible. There are even cases where it's
actually useful at the filesystem level although not many I agree.

Alan