From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Christopher Snowhill <kode54@gmail.com>,
xxxxxx xxxxxx <xxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: fix off-by-one error when warning that system has too much RAM
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:44:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180823134418.17008-1-vbabka@suse.cz> (raw)
Two users have reported [1] that they have an "extremely unlikely" system
with more than MAX_PA/2 memory and L1TF mitigation is not effective. In fact
it's a CPU with 36bits phys limit (64GB) and 32GB memory, but due to holes
in the e820 map, the main region is almost 500MB over the 32GB limit:
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000081effffff] usable
Suggestions to use 'mem=32G' to prefer L1TF mitigation while losing the 500MB
revealed, that there's an off-by-one error in the check in
l1tf_select_mitigation(). l1tf_pfn_limit() returns the last usable pfn
(inclusive), but it's more common and hopefully less error-prone to return the
first pfn that's over limit, so this patch changes that and updates the other
callers.
[1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105536
Reported-by: xxxxxx xxxxxx <xxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx>
Reported-by: Christopher Snowhill <kode54@gmail.com>
Fixes: 17dbca119312 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Add sysfs reporting for l1tf")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/init.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/mm/mmap.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index a0a52274cb4a..c24297268ebc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ extern void cpu_detect(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c);
static inline unsigned long long l1tf_pfn_limit(void)
{
- return BIT_ULL(boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits - 1 - PAGE_SHIFT) - 1;
+ return BIT_ULL(boot_cpu_data.x86_phys_bits - 1 - PAGE_SHIFT);
}
extern void early_cpu_init(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init.c b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
index 02de3d6065c4..63a6f9fcaf20 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init.c
@@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ unsigned long max_swapfile_size(void)
if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_L1TF)) {
/* Limit the swap file size to MAX_PA/2 for L1TF workaround */
- unsigned long long l1tf_limit = l1tf_pfn_limit() + 1;
+ unsigned long long l1tf_limit = l1tf_pfn_limit();
/*
* We encode swap offsets also with 3 bits below those for pfn
* which makes the usable limit higher.
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
index f40ab8185d94..1e95d57760cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mmap.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ bool pfn_modify_allowed(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
/* If it's real memory always allow */
if (pfn_valid(pfn))
return true;
- if (pfn > l1tf_pfn_limit() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ if (pfn >= l1tf_pfn_limit() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return false;
return true;
}
--
2.18.0
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-23 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-23 13:44 Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2018-08-23 13:56 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 14:28 ` [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: suggest what to do on systems with " Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-23 15:46 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 19:25 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 20:05 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-23 22:07 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 19:03 ` kbuild test robot
2018-08-23 19:23 ` kbuild test robot
2018-08-23 19:27 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-24 7:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 7:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/speculation/l1tf: Suggest " tip-bot for Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 10:36 ` [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: suggest " Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 12:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 12:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-08-24 13:57 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/speculation/l1tf: Suggest " tip-bot for Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-23 15:44 ` [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: fix off-by-one error when warning that system has " Andi Kleen
2018-08-23 20:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-08-24 2:22 ` Andre Tomt
2018-08-24 3:35 ` Andi Kleen
2018-08-29 2:04 ` Christopher Snowhill
2018-08-24 8:52 ` xxxxxx xxxxxx
2018-08-24 7:55 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/speculation/l1tf: Fix " tip-bot for Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180823134418.17008-1-vbabka@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kode54@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®