From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DA7C433F5 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 20:32:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEC120A8B for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 20:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="G0vjn4Rp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BFEC120A8B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=roeck-us.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727261AbeHYAJE (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 20:09:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:43251 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726728AbeHYAJE (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 20:09:04 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id j26-v6so5034336pfi.10; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:32:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=d5/EeagCYp5yRsfBdWnmEMLlTzipxCg1f/U5p4y54jc=; b=G0vjn4RpPQAMkpi/X6Tn+szvYOV75wgOnNcaeTCtb76U3b6yrytsqAQ+Dlya5Hzdow k3MpM3+WL1w+/fJMzjLSw8Ue7gjGF3t9TbzaP2yMb7b865lACEdK0b4WkA0PfFzYANEI fkoUU1NQLqdEOBwR8gmGK/R5Q0S108R9kKvvmFqF4hugh7sAaW0DRUsVqdOnDeSTBXrU q9mIUV43jDQ3bpIBKQ52OHiebAW2JO7chrMNttziwd7S+NRwXFrU4aOoWdGZnN7daawN jZhTT0kWbbuiS5ouZuSaQBGiRHNSZuYmkTh0unCyTqNgKW2O393HQgMBFIBCpPZt3/2D q/Vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=d5/EeagCYp5yRsfBdWnmEMLlTzipxCg1f/U5p4y54jc=; b=OjFIrW6+XH8dnkTyyDxIrinyBhRvNPsLoTVVzZj+gGQH1l49t5F8TGivhnzvfBPFLN V21ck2eiTLQ4BgF6mX0FAAigpi7NK+ZHQSHK5gQ9UE5T1JSShcXN/5+yCDWWzlDuz+4y H1LsZQAM+rwVMPAPtrxxsA2TA1ZDzmK7hS/A2tlOhq+leuoISPIuEbtSyvATjljsr1MY 3Ga1RPlLTt0qVuHt4K1fDq8o6wcrEtw4r2Y1+D0AwgUeeXkdTfzu87CZAnnY80xF4l0+ vGvKmiqR0nem32mNuQZqU4Cwnwc3AIGSPDQ70xwwcH7pe2vqeW43+StDQe2Nft9df6lo 8zoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Coavni9HTuCQaFpfWkeZtrb8ODTcdl306adcIjF0EyrDbu84so lnG9w45H1q40gh0gEzuKzv4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vda/skoLS6ZuvvkeRA2yu+ChL+OUdgUK+6lKc+0MThHpxOvDpBebdW/qE49vdpvNNt6D3MtJzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e516:: with SMTP id r22-v6mr3112754pgh.170.1535142772530; Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.223.40.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x23-v6sm8880391pff.9.2018.08.24.13.32.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:32:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 13:32:51 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Roland Dreier Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ben Hutchings , LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, bp@suse.de, Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , luto@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel , bp@alien8.de, brgerst@gmail.com, davej@codemonkey.org.uk, dvlasenk@redhat.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, Thomas Gleixner , toshi.kani@hp.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com, Guillaume Tucker Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 103/105] Revert "x86/mm/pat: Ensure cpa->pfn only contains page frame numbers" Message-ID: <20180824203251.GD18715@roeck-us.net> References: <20171215092305.994559179@linuxfoundation.org> <20171215092311.347628971@linuxfoundation.org> <1535129126.2902.36.camel@codethink.co.uk> <20180824191749.GA15489@kroah.com> <20180824201025.GB18715@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 01:16:18PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Sounds great. I'll hold off with sending my RFT series and wait for your > > test results. I think we'll also need d367cef0a7f0c6 ("x86/mm/pat: Fix > > boot crash when 1GB pages are not supported by the CPU"). > > Sure, makes sense - I don't have any EFI systems with CPUs old enough > not to support 1G pages but that looks reasonable. I'll pull that > into my tree as well. > kernelci reported a crash on a CPU which doesn't support 1G pages. See https://kernelci.org/boot/id/5b7d39ea59b514c03796ba9c/ Guenter