From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.19-rc1
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:11:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180827171152.GA2705@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180827154641.GA17201@infradead.org>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:46:41AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > sparc:
> >
> > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:516 esp_sbus_probe+0x408/0x6e8
> > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:516 sparc_lance_probe_one+0x428/0x4f
> >
> > Missing initialization of coherent_dma_mask in the respective drivers.
> >
> > ---
> > Each platform driver instantiated through a devicetree node now generates
> > the following warning:
> >
> > esp ffd38e00: DMA mask not set
> >
> > It isn't a traceback so it may fly under the radar. There is nothing the
> > drivers can do about it; the message is generated by the core before the
> > driver probe function is called. No idea what a correct fix might be.
>
> Both of these should probably be fixed by something like the patch
> below:
>
> ---
> From 6294e0e330851ee06e66ab85b348f1d92d375d7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 17:23:24 +0200
> Subject: driver core: initialize a default DMA mask for platform device
>
> We still treat devices without a DMA mask as defaulting to 32-bits for
> both mask, but a few releases ago we've started warning about such
> cases, as they require special cases to work around this sloppyness.
> Add a dma_mask field to struct platform_object so that we can initialize
> the dma_mask pointer in struct device and initialize both masks to
> 32-bits by default. Architectures can still override this in
> arch_setup_pdev_archdata if needed.
>
> Note that the code looks a little odd with the various conditionals
> because we have to support platform_device structures that are
> statically allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/base/platform.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> include/linux/platform_device.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> index dff82a3c2caa..baf4b06cf2d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> @@ -225,6 +225,17 @@ struct platform_object {
> char name[];
> };
>
> +static void setup_pdev_archdata(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + if (!pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask)
> + pdev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> + if (!pdev->dma_mask)
> + pdev->dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> + if (!pdev->dev.dma_mask)
> + pdev->dev.dma_mask = &pdev->dma_mask;
When building sparc32 images, this results in the following
error.
drivers/base/platform.c: In function 'setup_pdev_archdata':
drivers/base/platform.c:235:22: error: assignment from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
pdev->dev.dma_mask = &pdev->dma_mask;
pdev->dev.dma_mask is u64 *, pdev->dma_mask is dma_addr_t which in turn
is either u32 or u64 depending on the architecture.
> +++ b/include/linux/platform_device.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct platform_device {
> int id;
> bool id_auto;
> struct device dev;
> + dma_addr_t dma_mask;
... so this will have to be u64, or the pointer in struct device would
have to be fixed.
However, even changing the definition to u64 does not help: The warnings
are still reported. This is because setup_pdev_archdata() is not called
for any of the affected devices. That is kind of interesting since it
means that arch_setup_pdev_archdata() won't be called for those devices
either.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-27 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-26 21:49 Linus Torvalds
2018-08-27 1:39 ` linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 4.19-rc1) Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-27 13:44 ` Linux 4.19-rc1 Guenter Roeck
2018-08-27 15:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-27 17:11 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2018-08-27 18:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-08-27 19:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-27 21:32 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-08-27 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-28 16:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-08-27 19:10 ` Shuah Khan
2018-08-27 20:25 ` Winkler, Tomas
2018-08-29 9:56 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180827171152.GA2705@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®