From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, benh@au1.ibm.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/11] asm-generic/tlb: Track freeing of page-table directories in struct mmu_gather
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 15:46:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180828134638.GK24082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180827144457.3f4036e3@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 02:44:57PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> powerpc may be able to use the unmap granule thing to improve
> its page size dependent flushes, but it might prefer to go
> a different way and track start-end for different page sizes.
I don't really see how tracking multiple ranges would help much with
THP. The ranges would end up being almost the same if there is a good
mix of page sizes.
But something like:
void tlb_flush_one(struct mmu_gather *tlb, unsigned long addr)
{
if (tlb->cleared_ptes && (addr << BITS_PER_LONG - PAGE_SHIFT))
tblie_pte(addr);
if (tlb->cleared_pmds && (addr << BITS_PER_LONG - PMD_SHIFT))
tlbie_pmd(addr);
if (tlb->cleared_puds && (addr << BITS_PER_LONG - PUD_SHIFT))
tlbie_pud(addr);
}
void tlb_flush_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
{
unsigned long stride = 1UL << tlb_get_unmap_shift(tlb);
unsigned long addr;
for (addr = tlb->start; addr < tlb->end; addr += stride)
tlb_flush_one(tlb, addr);
ptesync();
}
Should workd I think. You'll only issue multiple TLBIEs on the
boundaries, not every stride.
And for hugetlb the above should be optimal, since stride and
tlb->cleared_* match up 1:1.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-28 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-24 15:52 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Avoid synchronous TLB invalidation for intermediate page-table entries on arm64 Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] arm64: tlb: Use last-level invalidation in flush_tlb_kernel_range() Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] arm64: tlb: Add DSB ISHST prior to TLBI in __flush_tlb_[kernel_]pgtable() Will Deacon
2018-08-24 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-28 13:03 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] arm64: pgtable: Implement p[mu]d_valid() and check in set_p[mu]d() Will Deacon
2018-08-24 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-28 12:49 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] arm64: tlb: Justify non-leaf invalidation in flush_tlb_range() Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] arm64: tlbflush: Allow stride to be specified for __flush_tlb_range() Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] arm64: tlb: Remove redundant !CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE code Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] asm-generic/tlb: Guard with #ifdef CONFIG_MMU Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] asm-generic/tlb: Track freeing of page-table directories in struct mmu_gather Will Deacon
2018-08-27 4:44 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-28 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-08-28 13:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-28 14:12 ` Nicholas Piggin
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] asm-generic/tlb: Track which levels of the page tables have been cleared Will Deacon
2018-08-27 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-08-28 13:12 ` Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] arm64: tlb: Adjust stride and type of TLBI according to mmu_gather Will Deacon
2018-08-24 15:52 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] arm64: tlb: Avoid synchronous TLBIs when freeing page tables Will Deacon
2018-08-24 16:20 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Avoid synchronous TLB invalidation for intermediate page-table entries on arm64 Linus Torvalds
2018-08-26 10:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-09-04 18:38 ` Jon Masters
2018-09-05 12:28 ` Will Deacon
2018-09-07 6:36 ` Jon Masters
2018-09-13 15:53 ` Will Deacon
2018-09-13 16:53 ` Jon Masters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180828134638.GK24082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®