From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rculist.h
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:53:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180829225405.7275-11-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180829225340.GA7019@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rculist.h | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rculist.h b/include/linux/rculist.h
index 4786c2235b98..e91ec9ddcd30 100644
--- a/include/linux/rculist.h
+++ b/include/linux/rculist.h
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static inline void list_replace_rcu(struct list_head *old,
* @list: the RCU-protected list to splice
* @prev: points to the last element of the existing list
* @next: points to the first element of the existing list
- * @sync: function to sync: synchronize_rcu(), synchronize_sched(), ...
+ * @sync: synchronize_rcu, synchronize_rcu_expedited, ...
*
* The list pointed to by @prev and @next can be RCU-read traversed
* concurrently with this function.
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static inline void __list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
* designed for stacks.
* @list: the RCU-protected list to splice
* @head: the place in the existing list to splice the first list into
- * @sync: function to sync: synchronize_rcu(), synchronize_sched(), ...
+ * @sync: synchronize_rcu, synchronize_rcu_expedited, ...
*/
static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
struct list_head *head,
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static inline void list_splice_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
* list, designed for queues.
* @list: the RCU-protected list to splice
* @head: the place in the existing list to splice the first list into
- * @sync: function to sync: synchronize_rcu(), synchronize_sched(), ...
+ * @sync: synchronize_rcu, synchronize_rcu_expedited, ...
*/
static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
struct list_head *head,
@@ -359,13 +359,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
* @type: the type of the struct this is embedded in.
* @member: the name of the list_head within the struct.
*
- * This primitive may safely run concurrently with the _rcu list-mutation
- * primitives such as list_add_rcu(), but requires some implicit RCU
- * read-side guarding. One example is running within a special
- * exception-time environment where preemption is disabled and where
- * lockdep cannot be invoked (in which case updaters must use RCU-sched,
- * as in synchronize_sched(), call_rcu_sched(), and friends). Another
- * example is when items are added to the list, but never deleted.
+ * This primitive may safely run concurrently with the _rcu
+ * list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu(), but requires some
+ * implicit RCU read-side guarding. One example is running within a special
+ * exception-time environment where preemption is disabled and where lockdep
+ * cannot be invoked. Another example is when items are added to the list,
+ * but never deleted.
*/
#define list_entry_lockless(ptr, type, member) \
container_of((typeof(ptr))READ_ONCE(ptr), type, member)
@@ -376,13 +375,12 @@ static inline void list_splice_tail_init_rcu(struct list_head *list,
* @head: the head for your list.
* @member: the name of the list_struct within the struct.
*
- * This primitive may safely run concurrently with the _rcu list-mutation
- * primitives such as list_add_rcu(), but requires some implicit RCU
- * read-side guarding. One example is running within a special
- * exception-time environment where preemption is disabled and where
- * lockdep cannot be invoked (in which case updaters must use RCU-sched,
- * as in synchronize_sched(), call_rcu_sched(), and friends). Another
- * example is when items are added to the list, but never deleted.
+ * This primitive may safely run concurrently with the _rcu
+ * list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu(), but requires some
+ * implicit RCU read-side guarding. One example is running within a special
+ * exception-time environment where preemption is disabled and where lockdep
+ * cannot be invoked. Another example is when items are added to the list,
+ * but never deleted.
*/
#define list_for_each_entry_lockless(pos, head, member) \
for (pos = list_entry_lockless((head)->next, typeof(*pos), member); \
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 22:53 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/24] Additional RCU-consolidation cleanups for v4.20/v5.0 Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/24] rcu: Inline increment_cpu_stall_ticks() into its sole caller Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/24] rcu: Pull rcu_gp_kthread() FQS loop into separate function Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/24] rcu: Consolidate RCU-bh update-side function definitions Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/24] rcu: Consolidate RCU-sched " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/24] rcutorture: Add RCU-bh and RCU-sched support for extended readers Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/24] rcu: Stop testing RCU-bh and RCU-sched Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/24] rcutorture: Remove the "rcu_bh" and "sched" torture types Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/24] rcuperf: " Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/24] rcu: Remove now-unused rcutorture APIs Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rcupdate.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rcupdate_wait.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in Kconfig Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rcu.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in rcutorture.c Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in srcutree.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tiny.c Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:53 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tree.c Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tree_exp.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tree_plugin.h Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in update.c Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/24] rcu: Remove !PREEMPT code from rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/24] rcu: Define rcu_all_qs() only in !PREEMPT builds Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-29 22:54 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/24] rcu: Inline _rcu_barrier() into its sole remaining caller Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180829225405.7275-11-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®