Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/topology: Expose numa_mask set/clear functions to arch

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 04:53:50AM -0700, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> [2018-08-31 13:26:39]:
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 01:12:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > NAK, not until you've fixed every cpu_to_node() user in the kernel to
> > > deal with that mask changing.
> > 
> > Also, what happens if userspace reads that information; uses libnuma and
> > then you go and shift the world underneath their feet?
> > 
> > > This is absolutely insane.
> > 
> 
> The topology events are suppose to be very rare.
> From whatever small experiments I have done till now, unless tasks are
> bound to both cpu and memory, they seem to be coping well with topology
> updates. I know things weren't optimal after a topology change but they
> worked. Now after 051f3ca02e46 "Introduce NUMA identity node sched
> domain", systems stall. I am only exploring at ways to keep them working
> as much as they were before that commit.

I'm saying things were fundamentally buggered and this just made it show.

If you cannot guarantee cpu:node relations, you do not have NUMA, end of
story.