From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B90C4321E for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DB02087F for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:06:43 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 89DB02087F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728533AbeIJVB2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:01:28 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:58574 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727815AbeIJVB1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:01:27 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: Nedap ESD1 at mail.skyhub.de Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (blast.alien8.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id lf0ERArjtTOl; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:06:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BC6F600329C23FFFEA6A903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bc6:f600:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 4DC481EC04A6; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:06:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 18:06:33 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Ville =?utf-8?B?U3lyasOkbMOk?= Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Dou Liyang , Pavel Tatashin , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/tsc: Consolidate init code" Message-ID: <20180910160633.GB4386@zn.tnic> References: <20180910121925.27682-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <20180910140710.GR5565@intel.com> <20180910144720.GA28349@zn.tnic> <20180910150910.GS5565@intel.com> <20180910152538.GA4386@zn.tnic> <20180910155112.GT5565@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180910155112.GT5565@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 06:51:13PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > Sounds to me like the maintainer should figure out how to delegate some > of the load a bit. Or just go on vacation and ignore all mails. I hear > stress isn't good for you. Bullshit. > That's what all patches are. No should be applying unreviewed patches > blindly. > > Also often a revert is a perfect way to handle regressions. It gets > the angry users off your back ASAP allowing you to fix the bug More bullshit. > Calm down. No one is out to revert all your patches. Even more bullshit. > Maybe you can propose a new git-regression tool then? And document that > you want bugs reported using it? Ideally I'd say it should do almost > exactly what git revert does except s/revert/regression/. Though I > suppose it could include the original diff instead of the reverse. Even even more bullshit. > Now, how about we stop this pointless "logic" discussion and > focus on the techinal stuff from now on? That's the only constructive and serious thing you've said so far. Let's. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.