From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C7DC46469 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BE42087F for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:17:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 33BE42087F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727832AbeILNVA (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:21:00 -0400 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:11689 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726537AbeILNVA (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2018 09:21:00 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1703B24B318DB; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:17:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.28) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:17:24 +0800 From: Jason Yan To: , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , Jason Yan , Ewan Milne , Tomas Henzl Subject: [PATCH 3/5] scsi: libsas: always unregister the old device if going to discover new Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:29:44 +0800 Message-ID: <20180912082946.34814-4-yanaijie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.4 In-Reply-To: <20180912082946.34814-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> References: <20180912082946.34814-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.28] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If we went into sas_rediscover_dev() the attached_sas_addr was already insured not to be zero. So it's unnecessary to check if the attached_sas_addr is zero. And although if the sas address is not changed, we always have to unregister the old device when we are going to register a new one. We cannot just leave the device there and bring up the new. Signed-off-by: Jason Yan CC: chenxiang CC: John Garry CC: Johannes Thumshirn CC: Ewan Milne CC: Christoph Hellwig CC: Tomas Henzl CC: Dan Williams CC: Hannes Reinecke Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn --- drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 13 +++++-------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index fadc99cb60df..52222940d398 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -2054,14 +2054,11 @@ static int sas_rediscover_dev(struct domain_device *dev, int phy_id, bool last) return res; } - /* delete the old link */ - if (SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr) && - SAS_ADDR(sas_addr) != SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr)) { - SAS_DPRINTK("ex %016llx phy 0x%x replace %016llx\n", - SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id, - SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr)); - sas_unregister_devs_sas_addr(dev, phy_id, last); - } + /* we always have to delete the old device when we went here */ + SAS_DPRINTK("ex %016llx phy 0x%x replace %016llx\n", + SAS_ADDR(dev->sas_addr), phy_id, + SAS_ADDR(phy->attached_sas_addr)); + sas_unregister_devs_sas_addr(dev, phy_id, last); return sas_discover_new(dev, phy_id); } -- 2.14.4