From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/10 v2 ] x86/fpu: eager switch PKRU state
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 16:27:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180918142701.atfb4ul45k7tl6ew@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a239e97a-d1a1-388e-5db9-10758c33d702@redhat.com>
On 2018-09-17 10:37:20 [+0200], Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > . This is (again)
> > untested since I have no box with this PKRU feature. This only available
> > on Intel's Xeon Scalable, right?
>
> It is available on QEMU too (the slower JIT thing without KVM, i.e. use
> /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 instead of /usr/bin/qemu-kvm or /usr/bin/kvm).
okay. I managed to get the kernel to report this flag as available now.
> > - if (preload)
> > - __fpregs_load_activate(new_fpu, cpu);
> > + if (!preload)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + __fpregs_load_activate(new_fpu, cpu);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> > + /* Protection keys need to be in place right at context switch time. */
> > + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE)) {
> > + if (new_fpu->pkru != __read_pkru())
> > + __write_pkru(new_fpu->pkru);
> > + }
> > +#endif
>
> I think this would be before the "if (preload)"?
I did not find an explicit loading of pkru except this "xrestore"
which happens on "preload". From what I saw, preload was always set
except for kernel threads. Based on that, it looks to me like it can be
skipped if there is no FPU/kernel thread.
> >
> > if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE))
> > - copy_init_pkru_to_fpregs();
> > + pkru_set_init_value();
> > }
> >
>
> Likewise, move this to fpu__clear and outside "if
> (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU))"?
okay. But if there is no FPU we did not save/restore the pkru value. Is
this supposed to be an improvement?
> Also, a __read_pkru() seems to be missing in switch_fpu_prepare.
But the value is stored during write_pkru(). So the copy that is saved
should be identical to the value that would be read, correct?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-18 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-12 13:33 [RFC PATCH] x86: load FPU registers on return to userland Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] x86/entry: remove _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-27 14:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] kvm: x86: make kvm_{load|put}_guest_fpu() static Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] x86/fpu: add (__)make_fpregs_active helpers Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] x86/fpu: eager switch PKRU state Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-12 15:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-12 15:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-14 20:35 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10 v2 ] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-17 8:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-18 14:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2018-09-18 15:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-18 15:11 ` Rik van Riel
2018-09-18 15:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-18 16:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-18 17:29 ` Rik van Riel
2018-09-19 5:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-19 16:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-19 17:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-09-19 17:19 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-19 19:38 ` Rik van Riel
2018-09-19 19:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-12 15:20 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] " Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-12 15:30 ` Rik van Riel
2018-09-12 15:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-19 16:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] x86/pkeys: Drop the preempt-disable section Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] x86/fpu: Always store the registers in copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] x86/entry: add TIF_LOAD_FPU Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] x86/fpu: prepare copy_fpstate_to_sigframe for TIF_LOAD_FPU Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] x86/fpu: copy non-resident FPU state at fork time Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 13:33 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] x86/fpu: defer FPU state load until return to userspace Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-12 15:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-19 17:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-21 3:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-21 4:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-26 11:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-26 14:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-09-26 15:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-09-26 16:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180918142701.atfb4ul45k7tl6ew@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®