From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=r9ZY=MB=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB64C433F4
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CDB21523
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 16:58:31 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 28CDB21523
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1732807AbeISWhP (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:37:15 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:33014 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1731366AbeISWhP (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:37:15 -0400
Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80)
        (envelope-from <bigeasy@linutronix.de>)
        id 1g2fo1-0006Pe-2U; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:58:25 +0200
Date:   Wed, 19 Sep 2018 18:58:25 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc:     Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/10] x86/fpu: eager switch PKRU state
Message-ID: <20180919165824.pedllijaci32gwd4@linutronix.de>
References: <20180912133353.20595-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20180912133353.20595-5-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <181B4EB8-9FEB-415C-8069-192FB8A5B418@amacapital.net>
 <a1ee2e5226c780312bd8ef5658f4b6422e7cf434.camel@surriel.com>
 <7C1494C8-C6CA-4599-A6B3-0833F358E3A2@amacapital.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7C1494C8-C6CA-4599-A6B3-0833F358E3A2@amacapital.net>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2018-09-12 08:49:01 [-0700], Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Sure, but the first write is *before* this. So we can be preempted with the two copies of PKRU being out of sync.

so it took a while to understand this but now that I did, I will
consider this in the next version. Thank you.

Sebastian