From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7644DC43382 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198C921533 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:34:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 198C921533 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727234AbeI0Cte (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:49:34 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:12173 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726766AbeI0Ctd (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:49:33 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Sep 2018 13:34:50 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,307,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="93990986" Received: from cschaufl-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.251.154.97]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2018 13:34:48 -0700 From: Casey Schaufler To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, casey.schaufler@intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, deneen.t.dock@intel.com, kristen@linux.intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com Subject: [PATCH v5 2/5] Smack: Prepare for PTRACE_MODE_SCHED Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 13:34:43 -0700 Message-Id: <20180926203446.2004-3-casey.schaufler@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20180926203446.2004-1-casey.schaufler@intel.com> References: <20180926203446.2004-1-casey.schaufler@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Casey Schaufler A ptrace access check with mode PTRACE_MODE_SCHED gets called from process switching code. This precludes the use of audit, as the locking is incompatible. Don't do audit in the PTRACE_MODE_SCHED case. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler --- security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c index 340fc30ad85d..ffa95bcab599 100644 --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c @@ -422,7 +422,8 @@ static int smk_ptrace_rule_check(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_smack *tsp; struct smack_known *tracer_known; - if ((mode & PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT) == 0) { + if ((mode & PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT) == 0 && + (mode & PTRACE_MODE_SCHED) == 0) { smk_ad_init(&ad, func, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_TASK); smk_ad_setfield_u_tsk(&ad, tracer); saip = &ad; -- 2.17.1