From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To: Intel SCU Linux support <intel-linux-scu@intel.com>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: isci: Use proper enumerated type in atapi_d2h_reg_frame_handler
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 17:11:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180927001150.26212-1-natechancellor@gmail.com> (raw)
Clang warns when one enumerated type is implicitly converted to another.
drivers/scsi/isci/request.c:1629:13: warning: implicit conversion from
enumeration type 'enum sci_io_status' to different enumeration type
'enum sci_status' [-Wenum-conversion]
status = SCI_IO_FAILURE_RESPONSE_VALID;
~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/isci/request.c:1631:12: warning: implicit conversion from
enumeration type 'enum sci_io_status' to different enumeration type
'enum sci_status' [-Wenum-conversion]
status = SCI_IO_FAILURE_RESPONSE_VALID;
~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
status is of type sci_status but SCI_IO_FAILURE_RESPONSE_VALID is of
type sci_io_status. Use SCI_FAILURE_IO_RESPONSE_VALID, which is from
sci_status and has SCI_IO_FAILURE_RESPONSE_VALID's exact value since
that is what SCI_IO_FAILURE_RESPONSE_VALID is mapped to in the isci.h
file.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/153
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/isci/request.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
index ed197bc8e801..2f151708b59a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
@@ -1626,9 +1626,9 @@ static enum sci_status atapi_d2h_reg_frame_handler(struct isci_request *ireq,
if (status == SCI_SUCCESS) {
if (ireq->stp.rsp.status & ATA_ERR)
- status = SCI_IO_FAILURE_RESPONSE_VALID;
+ status = SCI_FAILURE_IO_RESPONSE_VALID;
} else {
- status = SCI_IO_FAILURE_RESPONSE_VALID;
+ status = SCI_FAILURE_IO_RESPONSE_VALID;
}
if (status != SCI_SUCCESS) {
--
2.19.0
next reply other threads:[~2018-09-27 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-27 0:11 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2018-10-17 1:40 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180927001150.26212-1-natechancellor@gmail.com \
--to=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=intel-linux-scu@intel.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®