From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=J4ua=MJ=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2781C43382
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:21:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65A221531
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:21:46 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B65A221531
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727725AbeI0UkO (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:40:14 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:52070 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1727263AbeI0UkO (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:40:14 -0400
Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80)
        (envelope-from <bigeasy@linutronix.de>)
        id 1g5XAi-0004zT-I1; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:21:40 +0200
Date:   Thu, 27 Sep 2018 16:21:40 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] x86/entry: remove _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK
Message-ID: <20180927142140.kxjvjuuvbbqea6zw@linutronix.de>
References: <20180912133353.20595-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20180912133353.20595-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20180912133353.20595-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 2018-09-12 15:33:44 [+0200], To linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org wrote:
> There is no user of _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK since commit 21d375b6b34ff
> ("x86/entry/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 fast path").
> Remove unused define _TIF_ALLWORK_MASK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Is it okay for that one to be merged as-is or should I repost it without
the RFC?

Sebastian