From: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
To: Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@gmail.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sayalil@codeaurora.org
Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Schedule clk gating work on correct queue
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 10:27:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181005172732.203793-1-evgreen@chromium.org> (raw)
With commit 10e5e37581fc ("scsi: ufs: Add clock ungating to a separate
workqueue"), clock gating work was moved to a
separate work queue with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set, since clock
gating could occur from a memory reclaim context. Unfortunately,
clk_gating.gate_work was left queued via schedule_delayed_work,
which is a system workqueue that does not have WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set.
Because ufshcd_ungate_work attempts to cancel gate_work, the
following warning appears:
[ 14.174170] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM ufs_clk_gating_0:ufshcd_ungate_work is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:ufshcd_gate_work
[ 14.174179] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 173 at kernel/workqueue.c:2440 check_flush_dependency+0x110/0x118
[ 14.205725] CPU: 4 PID: 173 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Not tainted 4.14.68 #1
[ 14.212437] Hardware name: Google Cheza (rev1) (DT)
[ 14.217459] Workqueue: ufs_clk_gating_0 ufshcd_ungate_work
[ 14.223107] task: ffffffc0f6a40080 task.stack: ffffff800a490000
[ 14.229195] PC is at check_flush_dependency+0x110/0x118
[ 14.234569] LR is at check_flush_dependency+0x110/0x118
[ 14.239944] pc : [<ffffff80080cad14>] lr : [<ffffff80080cad14>] pstate: 60c001c9
[ 14.333050] Call trace:
[ 14.427767] [<ffffff80080cad14>] check_flush_dependency+0x110/0x118
[ 14.434219] [<ffffff80080cafec>] start_flush_work+0xac/0x1fc
[ 14.440046] [<ffffff80080caeec>] flush_work+0x40/0x94
[ 14.445246] [<ffffff80080cb288>] __cancel_work_timer+0x11c/0x1b8
[ 14.451433] [<ffffff80080cb4b8>] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x20/0x30
[ 14.457886] [<ffffff80085b9294>] ufshcd_ungate_work+0x24/0xd0
[ 14.463800] [<ffffff80080cfb04>] process_one_work+0x32c/0x690
[ 14.469713] [<ffffff80080d0154>] worker_thread+0x218/0x338
[ 14.475361] [<ffffff80080d527c>] kthread+0x120/0x130
[ 14.480470] [<ffffff8008084814>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
The simple solution is to put the gate_work on the same WQ_MEM_RECLAIM
work queue as the ungate_work.
Fixes: 10e5e37581fc ("scsi: ufs: Add clock ungating to a separate workqueue")
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index c55f38ec391c..54074dd483a7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -1691,8 +1691,9 @@ static void __ufshcd_release(struct ufs_hba *hba)
hba->clk_gating.state = REQ_CLKS_OFF;
trace_ufshcd_clk_gating(dev_name(hba->dev), hba->clk_gating.state);
- schedule_delayed_work(&hba->clk_gating.gate_work,
- msecs_to_jiffies(hba->clk_gating.delay_ms));
+ queue_delayed_work(hba->clk_gating.clk_gating_workq,
+ &hba->clk_gating.gate_work,
+ msecs_to_jiffies(hba->clk_gating.delay_ms));
}
void ufshcd_release(struct ufs_hba *hba)
--
2.16.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-10-05 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-05 17:27 Evan Green [this message]
2018-10-17 20:06 ` Doug Anderson
2018-10-17 20:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-10-18 0:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181005172732.203793-1-evgreen@chromium.org \
--to=evgreen@chromium.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sayalil@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®