From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7EAC32788 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EFA2098A for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="KX6f+7Rq"; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=codeaurora.org header.i=@codeaurora.org header.b="KX6f+7Rq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 38EFA2098A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728347AbeJKRQT (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:16:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:45184 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726750AbeJKRQR (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 13:16:17 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8CEE60C8A; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:49:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1539251385; bh=Qs7WWaBHahUgPCs4lu3CEuSrR+vGi3nxdpsz9rtgaiM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KX6f+7RqWO+dLe79qN7fBuFy3ai0nh6S5gA41UzwfVxbNYH3Axjos25jyChzqhc19 n+N8VcKqf8T+eNjSCQorV1/ZBfb5CIpB+wk2yVdY2m1wJKc6CCmSNnZunZKkWitzxf 45K4zgHl9jpcPBTPVsKMItWSl2zdXLxNYFpKi7RE= Received: from blr-ubuntu-41.ap.qualcomm.com (blr-bdr-fw-01_globalnat_allzones-outside.qualcomm.com [103.229.18.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: vivek.gautam@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B1BE60C62; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:49:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1539251385; bh=Qs7WWaBHahUgPCs4lu3CEuSrR+vGi3nxdpsz9rtgaiM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KX6f+7RqWO+dLe79qN7fBuFy3ai0nh6S5gA41UzwfVxbNYH3Axjos25jyChzqhc19 n+N8VcKqf8T+eNjSCQorV1/ZBfb5CIpB+wk2yVdY2m1wJKc6CCmSNnZunZKkWitzxf 45K4zgHl9jpcPBTPVsKMItWSl2zdXLxNYFpKi7RE= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 3B1BE60C62 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org From: Vivek Gautam To: joro@8bytes.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, andy.gross@linaro.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, david.brown@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dianders@chromium.org, Vivek Gautam Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding doc for Qcom smmu-500 Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 15:19:29 +0530 Message-Id: <20181011094930.17010-2-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.1.72.g5be1f00a9a70 In-Reply-To: <20181011094930.17010-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> References: <20181011094930.17010-1-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Qcom's implementation of arm,mmu-500 works well with current arm-smmu driver implementation. Adding a soc specific compatible along with arm,mmu-500 makes the bindings future safe. Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam --- Changes since v3: - Refined language more to state things directly for the bindings description. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt index a6504b37cc21..3133f3ba7567 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ conditions. "qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2", "qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2". + Qcom SoCs implementing "arm,mmu-500" must also include, + as below, SoC-specific compatibles: + "qcom,sdm845-smmu-500", "arm,mmu-500" + - reg : Base address and size of the SMMU. - #global-interrupts : The number of global interrupts exposed by the -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation