From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43104C43441 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F073F2064E for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="yqvdHwKF" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F073F2064E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728257AbeJLShI (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:37:08 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59402 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727640AbeJLShH (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:37:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (ip-213-127-77-176.ip.prioritytelecom.net [213.127.77.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DFEB20868; Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:05:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1539342313; bh=+vDSeJ6z+V2OSQOh/gem8wtpTRkNzrVqx5d7uL9eUPI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yqvdHwKFzvRF095jhn8KuFFgAU63qDgIm8+GTPfUln8842vw/WxVFI009/ChmBIu2 4Wsp6dvbaX2TBW+oWwo5Jfdlzv867Ljel5G2IeVb7piwpNEBB8mbwEfRB33G5d8Awa Pg+z9t+qYnZdobcIF3Locy7jL8jweM+2DFFykfec= Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 13:05:11 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Amit Pundir , Sudip Mukherjee Cc: linux-kernel , Stable , prsood@codeaurora.org, Tejun Heo , amit.pundir@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 29/45] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock Message-ID: <20181012110511.GB26625@kroah.com> References: <20181011152508.885515042@linuxfoundation.org> <20181011152510.156825448@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 08:33:34PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 4:54 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Prateek Sood > > > > commit aa24163b2ee5c92120e32e99b5a93143a0f4258e upstream. > > This has been already reverted in upstream. > bdfbbda90aeb ("Revert "cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock"") > > Might be better to add e8b3f8db7aad ("workqueue/hotplug: simplify > workqueue_offline_cpu()") instead which is mentioned in the revert > commit. Good point. I'm dropping this patch for now. Amit, can you test the above patch instead and figure out why you wanted to add a patch to the tree that ended up being reverted? :) thanks, greg k-h > > -- > Regards > Sudip