From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE2FC04AA5 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8F62064A for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sirena.org.uk header.i=@sirena.org.uk header.b="Z4fD1ff9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6E8F62064A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726609AbeJOSJQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:09:16 -0400 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:54368 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726273AbeJOSJP (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:09:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nrj+W0Mi6FpvxRGZ/zF9Dk5Sun48zVUP4hpf1kRkCnY=; b=Z4fD1ff9t/mqRNfFm2t1GKgo8 tauTONJ6Hd+s7j79eoRbvKevWYWieVB4W1zor6m7q0LAErKfmQD9BF/AcHZbmkL0umeKCjOeVAXme XMu1YLz9XjCdxt5X2U9p3TqudR19yzbPphe/dtRUOKPPAym3beespXNyZdGsPws4ToGZ0=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=debutante.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gC039-0002zd-0a; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:24:35 +0000 Received: by debutante.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4A9611224A9; Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:24:34 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 11:24:34 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: Shawn Guo , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: misc: bk4: Add device tree binding for Liebherr's BK4 SPI bus Message-ID: <20181015102434.GC6277@sirena.org.uk> References: <20180927222655.24482-1-lukma@denx.de> <20181008144350.GS3587@dragon> <20181009122114.39ff3553@jawa> <20181015121716.2362d286@jawa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181015121716.2362d286@jawa> X-Cookie: Call for details. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 12:17:16PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Gentle ping on this patch (as corresponding DTS file has been already > pulled by Shawn). Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. --4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlvEauEACgkQJNaLcl1U h9B2xQf9Gd/mUcN0Qee3PMMvp0q31F78mAEZGVZwkDuKstj5VgRZ6Cx9f48jjArX ZvbPnHfdkfTmgmGvCzLDBZ6hzI/cR/cqWbaKCgLJyTKOv8TD79psM+UQZKwjiIGq LncZ97JhomURxaHrskcG8nms1bl/bOJhoD0GwpO2zwM75L3crOZuMZN8vVJzQedb GShEh7Q0uPWq1Ix9dHjYhYz8jjYxPp8za1Yoxq2dBClrSzU/9F77Flm+8hzxLs8C tizlPjpPWydJ7kVxd67D6POPrEed6uw6SD0JopF2/llWsVMtmkb+bXkWRNmExivj 80ji5VB9pfrB5rn+YdPNzkeYpINPiw== =uwsY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4jXrM3lyYWu4nBt5--