From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 5/8] drm/omap: Add global state as a private atomic object
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:29:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181016122946.GU31561@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181012201703.29065-6-bparrot@ti.com>
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 03:17:00PM -0500, Benoit Parrot wrote:
> Global shared resources (like hw overlays) for omapdrm are implemented
> as a part of atomic state using the drm_private_obj infrastructure
> available in the atomic core.
>
> omap_global_state is introduced as a drm atomic private object. The two
> funcs omap_get_global_state() and omap_get_existing_global_state() are
> the two variants that will be used to access omap_global_state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h | 23 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
> index 2921cc90f2d8..94658ec79c76 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c
> @@ -129,6 +129,94 @@ static const struct drm_mode_config_funcs omap_mode_config_funcs = {
> .atomic_commit = drm_atomic_helper_commit,
> };
>
> +/* Global/shared object state funcs */
> +
> +/*
> + * This is a helper that returns the private state currently in operation.
> + * Note that this would return the "old_state" if called in the atomic check
> + * path, and the "new_state" after the atomic swap has been done.
> + */
> +struct omap_global_state *
> +omap_get_existing_global_state(struct omap_drm_private *priv)
> +{
> + return to_omap_global_state(priv->glob_obj.state);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This acquires the modeset lock set aside for global state, creates
> + * a new duplicated private object state.
> + */
> +struct omap_global_state *__must_check
> +omap_get_global_state(struct drm_atomic_state *s)
> +{
> + struct omap_drm_private *priv = s->dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_private_state *priv_state;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!drm_modeset_is_locked(&priv->glob_obj_lock)) {
> + ret = drm_modeset_lock(&priv->glob_obj_lock, s->acquire_ctx);
> + if (ret) {
> + DBG("getting priv->glob_obj_lock (%p) failed %d",
> + &priv->glob_obj_lock, ret);
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + priv_state = drm_atomic_get_private_obj_state(s, &priv->glob_obj);
One of the refactors I had in mind (and which would be possible now that
private state structs are implemented as properly structs, instead of void
* pointers): Add a drm_modeset_lock to drm_private_obj and avoid having to
duplicate that over all implementations. Not everyone wants a per-obj
lock, but no one will be hurt by having a per-obj lock - drm_modeset_lock
is very extensible in that way. And we could drop the custom locking code
everyone has to roll themselves.
Just a drive-by refactor idea.
-Daniel
> + if (IS_ERR(priv_state))
> + return ERR_CAST(priv_state);
> +
> + return to_omap_global_state(priv_state);
> +}
> +
> +static struct drm_private_state *
> +omap_global_duplicate_state(struct drm_private_obj *obj)
> +{
> + struct omap_global_state *state;
> +
> + state = kmemdup(obj->state, sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!state)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + __drm_atomic_helper_private_obj_duplicate_state(obj, &state->base);
> +
> + return &state->base;
> +}
> +
> +static void omap_global_destroy_state(struct drm_private_obj *obj,
> + struct drm_private_state *state)
> +{
> + struct omap_global_state *omap_state = to_omap_global_state(state);
> +
> + kfree(omap_state);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct drm_private_state_funcs omap_global_state_funcs = {
> + .atomic_duplicate_state = omap_global_duplicate_state,
> + .atomic_destroy_state = omap_global_destroy_state,
> +};
> +
> +static int omap_global_obj_init(struct omap_drm_private *priv)
> +{
> + struct omap_global_state *state;
> +
> + drm_modeset_lock_init(&priv->glob_obj_lock);
> +
> + state = kzalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!state)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + drm_atomic_private_obj_init(&priv->glob_obj, &state->base,
> + &omap_global_state_funcs);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void omap_global_obj_fini(struct omap_drm_private *priv)
> +{
> + drm_atomic_private_obj_fini(&priv->glob_obj);
> + drm_modeset_lock_fini(&priv->glob_obj_lock);
> +}
> +
> static void omap_disconnect_pipelines(struct drm_device *ddev)
> {
> struct omap_drm_private *priv = ddev->dev_private;
> @@ -569,10 +657,14 @@ static int omapdrm_init(struct omap_drm_private *priv, struct device *dev)
>
> omap_gem_init(ddev);
>
> - ret = omap_hwoverlays_init(priv);
> + ret = omap_global_obj_init(priv);
> if (ret)
> goto err_gem_deinit;
>
> + ret = omap_hwoverlays_init(priv);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_free_priv_obj;
> +
> ret = omap_modeset_init(ddev);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(priv->dev, "omap_modeset_init failed: ret=%d\n", ret);
> @@ -612,6 +704,8 @@ static int omapdrm_init(struct omap_drm_private *priv, struct device *dev)
> err_cleanup_modeset:
> drm_mode_config_cleanup(ddev);
> omap_drm_irq_uninstall(ddev);
> +err_free_priv_obj:
> + omap_global_obj_fini(priv);
> err_free_overlays:
> omap_hwoverlays_destroy(priv);
> err_gem_deinit:
> @@ -644,6 +738,7 @@ static void omapdrm_cleanup(struct omap_drm_private *priv)
> omap_drm_irq_uninstall(ddev);
> omap_gem_deinit(ddev);
>
> + omap_global_obj_fini(priv);
> omap_hwoverlays_destroy(priv);
>
> destroy_workqueue(priv->wq);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
> index 929f04e7cc3b..f374dc100447 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #include <drm/drmP.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
> #include <drm/drm_crtc_helper.h>
> #include <drm/drm_gem.h>
> #include <drm/omap_drm.h>
> @@ -54,6 +55,17 @@ struct omap_drm_pipeline {
> struct omap_dss_device *display;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Global private object state for tracking resources that are shared across
> + * multiple kms objects (planes/crtcs/etc).
> + */
> +#define to_omap_global_state(x) container_of(x, struct omap_global_state, base)
> +struct omap_global_state {
> + struct drm_private_state base;
> +
> + struct drm_atomic_state *state;
> +};
> +
> struct omap_drm_private {
> struct drm_device *ddev;
> struct device *dev;
> @@ -73,6 +85,13 @@ struct omap_drm_private {
> unsigned int num_ovls;
> struct omap_hw_overlay *overlays[8];
>
> + /*
> + * Global private object state, Do not access directly, use
> + * omap_global_get_state()
> + */
> + struct drm_modeset_lock glob_obj_lock;
> + struct drm_private_obj glob_obj;
> +
> struct drm_fb_helper *fbdev;
>
> struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> @@ -100,5 +119,9 @@ struct omap_drm_private {
>
>
> int omap_debugfs_init(struct drm_minor *minor);
> +struct omap_global_state *__must_check
> +omap_get_global_state(struct drm_atomic_state *s);
> +struct omap_global_state *
> +omap_get_existing_global_state(struct omap_drm_private *priv);
>
> #endif /* __OMAPDRM_DRV_H__ */
> --
> 2.9.0
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-16 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-12 20:16 [Patch v4 0/8] drm/omap: Add virtual-planes support Benoit Parrot
2018-10-12 20:16 ` [Patch v4 1/8] drm/omap: Add ability to check if requested plane modes can be supported Benoit Parrot
2018-10-12 20:16 ` [Patch v4 2/8] drm/omap: Add ovl checking funcs to dispc_ops Benoit Parrot
2018-10-12 20:16 ` [Patch v4 3/8] drm/omap: introduce omap_hw_overlay Benoit Parrot
2018-10-12 20:16 ` [Patch v4 4/8] drm/omap: omap_plane: subclass drm_plane_state Benoit Parrot
2018-10-12 20:17 ` [Patch v4 5/8] drm/omap: Add global state as a private atomic object Benoit Parrot
2018-10-16 12:29 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-10-18 13:11 ` Benoit Parrot
2018-10-19 7:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-10-12 20:17 ` [Patch v4 6/8] drm/omap: dynamically assign hw overlays to planes Benoit Parrot
2018-10-12 20:17 ` [Patch v4 7/8] drm/omap: add plane_atomic_print_state support Benoit Parrot
2018-10-12 20:17 ` [Patch v4 8/8] drm/omap: Add a 'right overlay' to plane state Benoit Parrot
2018-11-19 16:02 ` [Patch v4 0/8] drm/omap: Add virtual-planes support Benoit Parrot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181016122946.GU31561@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=bparrot@ti.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jsarha@ti.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®