From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.co>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: remove redundant 'default n' from Kconfig-s
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 10:33:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181017083349.GC22535@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016134217eucas1p2102984488b89178a865162553369025b~eGpI5NlJo0851008510eucas1p2D@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
Hi Bart,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 03:42:16PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 'default n' is the default value for any bool or tristate Kconfig
> setting so there is no need to write it explicitly.
>
> Also since commit f467c5640c29 ("kconfig: only write '# CONFIG_FOO
> is not set' for visible symbols") the Kconfig behavior is the same
> regardless of 'default n' being present or not:
>
> ...
> One side effect of (and the main motivation for) this change is making
> the following two definitions behave exactly the same:
>
> config FOO
> bool
>
> config FOO
> bool
> default n
>
> With this change, neither of these will generate a
> '# CONFIG_FOO is not set' line (assuming FOO isn't selected/implied).
> That might make it clearer to people that a bare 'default n' is
> redundant.
> ...
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 7 -------
> arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 1 -
> arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 9 deletions(-)
looks good, no difference of allmodconfigs before and after.
But that close before the merge window and it not being urgent, I'll
queue it after the merge window.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-17 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20181016134217eucas1p2102984488b89178a865162553369025b@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2018-10-16 13:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2018-10-17 8:33 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181017083349.GC22535@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.co \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®