From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] staging: greybus: loopback.c: remove unused lists
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:48:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181024104820.20298-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005142826.26108-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
gb_loopback_device::list_op_async is never used except for the
LIST_INIT. The ::list field appears to have a few more uses, but on
closer inspection the linked list of struct gb_loopbacks that it heads
is never used for anything, so there's no reason to maintain it, much
less to keep it sorted.
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@nexus-software.ie>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
---
Sending as a proper patch. Marked v2 since this replaces earlier 2/3
and 3/3 patches. Applies on top of
b4fc4e8340784e000030c5a59bf0791f9c3ce15e (staging: greybus:
loopback.c: remove unused gb_loopback::lbid).
drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c | 38 ------------------------------
1 file changed, 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
index 7080294f705c..e4d42c1dc284 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/loopback.c
@@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ struct gb_loopback_device {
/* We need to take a lock in atomic context */
spinlock_t lock;
- struct list_head list;
- struct list_head list_op_async;
wait_queue_head_t wq;
};
@@ -68,7 +66,6 @@ struct gb_loopback {
struct kfifo kfifo_lat;
struct mutex mutex;
struct task_struct *task;
- struct list_head entry;
struct device *dev;
wait_queue_head_t wq;
wait_queue_head_t wq_completion;
@@ -987,37 +984,6 @@ static const struct file_operations gb_loopback_debugfs_latency_ops = {
.release = single_release,
};
-static int gb_loopback_bus_id_compare(void *priv, struct list_head *lha,
- struct list_head *lhb)
-{
- struct gb_loopback *a = list_entry(lha, struct gb_loopback, entry);
- struct gb_loopback *b = list_entry(lhb, struct gb_loopback, entry);
- struct gb_connection *ca = a->connection;
- struct gb_connection *cb = b->connection;
-
- if (ca->bundle->intf->interface_id < cb->bundle->intf->interface_id)
- return -1;
- if (cb->bundle->intf->interface_id < ca->bundle->intf->interface_id)
- return 1;
- if (ca->bundle->id < cb->bundle->id)
- return -1;
- if (cb->bundle->id < ca->bundle->id)
- return 1;
- if (ca->intf_cport_id < cb->intf_cport_id)
- return -1;
- else if (cb->intf_cport_id < ca->intf_cport_id)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void gb_loopback_insert_id(struct gb_loopback *gb)
-{
- /* perform an insertion sort */
- list_add_tail(&gb->entry, &gb_dev.list);
- list_sort(NULL, &gb_dev.list, gb_loopback_bus_id_compare);
-}
-
#define DEBUGFS_NAMELEN 32
static int gb_loopback_probe(struct gb_bundle *bundle,
@@ -1113,7 +1079,6 @@ static int gb_loopback_probe(struct gb_bundle *bundle,
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&gb_dev.lock, flags);
- gb_loopback_insert_id(gb);
gb_dev.count++;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gb_dev.lock, flags);
@@ -1169,7 +1134,6 @@ static void gb_loopback_disconnect(struct gb_bundle *bundle)
spin_lock_irqsave(&gb_dev.lock, flags);
gb_dev.count--;
- list_del(&gb->entry);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gb_dev.lock, flags);
device_unregister(gb->dev);
@@ -1196,8 +1160,6 @@ static int loopback_init(void)
{
int retval;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gb_dev.list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&gb_dev.list_op_async);
spin_lock_init(&gb_dev.lock);
gb_dev.root = debugfs_create_dir("gb_loopback", NULL);
--
2.19.1.6.gbde171bbf5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-24 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-05 14:28 [PATCH 1/3] staging: greybus: loopback.c: remove unused gb_loopback::lbid Rasmus Villemoes
2018-10-05 14:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: greybus: loopback.c: do insertion in O(n) instead of O(n lg n) Rasmus Villemoes
2018-10-10 23:03 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2018-10-11 10:11 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-10-23 16:20 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2018-10-23 22:30 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2018-10-05 14:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: greybus: loopback.c: simplify prototype of gb_loopback_bus_id_compare Rasmus Villemoes
2018-10-10 22:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: greybus: loopback.c: remove unused gb_loopback::lbid Bryan O'Donoghue
2018-10-24 10:48 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181024104820.20298-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pure.logic@nexus-software.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®